44 Comments
User's avatar
Terry Wears's avatar

Excellent reporting , thank you Alex. I follow you faithfully on your podcasts , especially with Crypto Rich.

Ronin's avatar

Alex has made revelations like these common sense. Richard C. Cook is another good one…

US Congress is Anglo-Zionist as Zionism is a construct of British imperialism. The Empire and its stooges (CIA, Mi-6 etc) - hates Russia because they bankrolled “The American Revolution”, as well as Abraham Lincoln’s attempt to hold the union together - whereas the British supported the Confederacy.

The British empire recaptured our government thru the banking system, which explains US Congress and Crown’s mutual hatred of Russia. US politicians sold us out many generations ago. Releasing the Epstein files has been a worthwhile step toward finally revealing these associations to the American public

Bard Joseph's avatar

Russians sent a navy to east and west coast to save Lincoln.

Won't find that in our history books.

Robert Ritchie's avatar

More precisely, it was to send a strong signal to France and the UK: "don't intervene". Lincoln was grateful!

Ronin's avatar
4hEdited

I’m always searching for ways to explain things that will make sense to the masses (us in other words!).

I was also quite relieved to hear Russia - and China - sent their Navies to the ME to shut down whatever the empire was cooking up!

Robert Ritchie's avatar

Thanks, but I'm not sure they're interested in any kind of "shut down" that might amount to a shooting war. Logistics are not on their side: AIUI their nearest bases (the Chinese have access to one on the eastern Indian subcontinent) are further away than the US base at Diego Garcia - unless they have pre-positioned supplies in Iranian bases? (on which I have no idea)

That said, I expect their presence may discourage any "accident" that otherwise might be suffered by the Chinese spy ship that's shadowing the USN and (presumably?) transmitting real-time intelligence to Iran to support real-time targeting. As also a heavy hint to emphasize such surveillance, on top of the satellite intelligence (from both Russia and China) that it's reasonable(?) to suppose is also tracking the USN and air bases in the region.

There are too many unknowns in the above, let alone the unknown capabilities of the moist advanced Iranian missiles, for either the USA or Iran to feel fully comfortable with a shooting war. Though I accept Iran logistically has the edge.

Terry Wears's avatar

Excellent perspective , I concur wholeheartedly.

pandelis's avatar
5hEdited

"Zionism is a construct of British imperialism"

the other way around as d'israeli told an englishman in the parliament. zionism has existed long before britain and its imperialism came into the world scene. look at the "spanish" looking names listed as stockholders (owners) of Bank of England since early 1700s.

Kathy M.'s avatar

I was trying to figure out how to mention Zionism. It may not have originated in England but at some point in history it clamped its jaws on England.

Bard Joseph's avatar

William of Orange and the murder of Charles l.

Kathy M.'s avatar

oooo, thanks!

pandelis's avatar
4hEdited

in 1500s joseph nasi sent hebrews into palestine to establish israel. look into jewish enciclopedia. of course, ended into a disaster since they were not used to do the hard work in the field. these things go back long way, history is not what is taught to us in schools.

btw, joseph nasi moved to constandinople (instanbul) after the fall of the Roman Empire in 1453 (same suspects as usual beyond it, earlier attempt in 1200s with venice). he was the power beyond suleyman the magnificent we hear so much nowdays, and had him kill his uncle and brothers.

Bard Joseph's avatar

Canaanites go back to the bible.

Read Eustace Mullins Curse of Canaan. Britain was a way station.

pandelis's avatar

eustace was a real american hero, a great human being.

Ronin's avatar

Thanks Pandelis, I re-worded the first sentence should I reshare it in a day or two

neil's avatar

Without the Scofield Bible, it [British Zionism] never would have happened. Cyrus I. Scofield developed dispensationalism to convince American evangelicals to shift from traditional theology and instead endorses a distinct [British Zionist] vision for establishing the modern State of Israel, separate from the Christian Church. The Rothschilds, linked to Benjamin Disraeli, a British Prime Minister of Jewish descent (1868, 1874–1880), endorsed a Babylonian Rādhānite narrative with Nathan Mayer Rothschild, advancing Zionist aims to control Palestine. Disraeli’s policies, notably his advocacy for British imperialism, supported Zionist goals. Other Zionist figures, such as Sir Alfred Mond, co-founder of the British Pilgrims Society (1902) also played key roles.

Utopian Fool's avatar

Cross the Channel to discover that, in 2020, Judge Durand chaired an independent government inquiry into incest and child sexual abuse in France. 3 years later, his detailed report concluded that some 160,000 children a year were victims of sexual abuse, with just 3% of criminal complaints resulting in any conviction. His report put forward some 82 recommendations to try to remedy the issue. Guess what happened next? Despite the general public's support and approval of his CIIVISE report, the government fired him and replaced him with a "yes man" who proceeded to essentially bury the report. France is probably the most corrupt country in the EU by a country mile.

Wally TangoFoxtrot's avatar

Also the same ‘Sir’ Keir Starmer who, as head of Crown Prosecutions saw that complaints and investigations against Jimmy Saville were summarily buried.

I soon expect members of the compromised network to all show up one day in the House without trousers and vow that they are in solidarity against the Starmer-Mandelson cabal.

Next stop: The Ministry of Silly Walks.

Moebius Infinity's avatar

Who is/are todays BBC Jimmy Savile substitute? We dont know but we do know there are... If there is a market there is a product.

MARTIN ELLIS's avatar

Turns out the "Heart of Darkness" was never in the depths of the African jungle, but in the halls of Westminster and the "public" schools of the English elite - " rum, sodomy and the lash" just about says it all.

Kathy M.'s avatar

You know more than you are saying!

Robert Ritchie's avatar

Hey, what's wrong with rum, sodomy, and the lash? :)

Jacques's avatar

The British have been and are a the root of all the abuses of what was called democracy; a true scarecrow game.

Kathy M.'s avatar
5hEdited

Alex, You are such a dear! Thank you! 💖 I don't see how anyone who lives a perverted life can think straight.... even as regards the masters they serve. Although if their real masters are also pervs, well it is possible they are all of the same mindset. Barf to all of them.

Simon Abbott's avatar

Alex, for quite a few weeks now in various podcasts and now in this new article, you have given the distinct impression that the horrendous history of abuse of women and girls that has been systematically covered up for decades was exclusively carried out by Pakistani grooming gangs. This is simply not the case.

Were Pakistani grooming gangs operating? Yes. Did they often act with the police deliberately turning a blind eye? Yes..Were senior politicians and police officers involved in covering things up (and even involved) for a long time? Yes. A very very long time. Much longer than you are giving the impression of.

Alex you should know that these horrendous crimes have been going on for many many decades. All over the UK. And well before there were any Pakistanis in the North of England at all. And they have always been covered up. Just like Epstein's crimes were covered up, by intelligence and police forces. Drugs are involved too.

We can speculate just why that has been the case. And why these crimes have suddenly been revealed to huge media outrage and with the impression that it was 'these crazy Islamists what done it'. There is a concerted attempt to build civil unrest in the UK. The old divide and rule doctrine of the Empire is being turned against all the British people. One of the classic tools is to stir up racial and religious hatred. It is vicious and quite deliberate.

But you know all about this, now don't you? This is exactly what the British intelligence services did in the former Yugoslavia...

And here you are now helping them do it again by recklessly distorting the real story. Please don't.

Melvyn Punymeyer's avatar

I suspect the only reason X hasn't been banned in the UK is that it's still the most effective way for the scum there to belittle Americans, anti-Americanism being the only form of truly protected speech in the lice-infested Islamic daycare center of Perfidious Albion. If it wasn't for that, X would be gone pronto.

Jonathan Hearn's avatar

Yes yes but!! I suspect Alex is a schill for the reform party..the Musk and Palantir party. His ideas that the US under Trump, and Russia might unite against the left over British controlled world economy are fanciful. Trump is nothing other than the current world actor for the deep state. Yes perhaps there is a battle within the west for economic hegemony but Russia will always be the arch enemy ( and now China) until the west is military defeated.

Boze's avatar

Troll 🧌

Bard Joseph's avatar

“(America) is just an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for President or being elected President; and the same thing applies to governors, and U.S. Senators and Congress members,” revealed former President Jimmy Carter

James Schwartz's avatar

Yea, because he was right about so many things. He should’ve stayed on the farm.

A Woman Called Paddy's avatar

Haven’t read this properly yet but it’s perfectly normal practice in Britain to have a sign language service on important announcements for some decades now.

IGW's avatar

Maybe. But Alex makes a valid point: it IS distracting. And why do they choose (usually) unattractive people with flamboyant & annoyingly exaggerated gesticulations, often mouthing the words as they 'translate'? It's fascinatingly, ugly/horrible and one tends to pay more attention to them than the speaker.

If they must have them, put them in a little box at the top of the screen, almost out of sight - unless you're deaf & need that signing, then it's there for you.

PS I'm not in the UK otherwise might expect a knock on the door by the flat-foots...better not be too complacent though...my country is going the same way.

Bard Joseph's avatar

Define important. Just a distraction.

Alfred Nassim's avatar

Spot on.

How about checking out the British goat with an island in the Caribbean?

Moby Grape 909's avatar

Branson.Dodgy as hell.

Jim Hogue's avatar

Sibel told me the same thing on the air - that no-one is allowed a key position in government who is not already compromised. Specifically, we were talking about Leahy who stabbed her in the back over her whistleblowing re Hastert et al.

sophia's avatar

ok but I the arrests in the UK are for 2023 when Starmer was not yet prime minister. where are the stats for his government? you are using these stats to say that Starmer is scared but these show that the Torries were afraid of....? can't follow your thinking here

Marguerite9's avatar

Thank you for talking about the practice of putting into power those individuals with the most "skeletons in their closets," ensuring that positions of power are filled with "low-caliber, compromised" sock puppets. All we have to do is look around at who is/was in power. Biden, with his mental incapacities, became the ideal to strive for, it seems, but they'll take compromised yes-men any day of the week.