56 Comments

"And speaking of bikes or other stuff stolen from Britons (not by parrots), British law enforcement has pretty much abandoned them to criminals"

And that's with surveillance cameras everywhere...

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

Not to put too fine a point on it, but someone a lot smarter than me once said "Satan is the father of lies".

Just sayin.

Expand full comment

The state cannot stop me from wishing a Merry Christmas to you and your family. Merry Christmas!

Expand full comment

I used to think about escaping to Russia if things became too suffocating here in the West. Land there is cheap after all. But after learning of Russia's embrace of new surveillance technology including digital IDs, face recognition technology and a digital rubble, my interest has waned somewhat.

I'm now taking an interest now in sub-Saharan Africa. I suspect most countries down there simply don't have the technology and wherewithal to truly spy on and oppress its citizenry.

As a long distance sailor on one of my journeys I spent a winter in The Gambia some years ago. If you needed something, and had the money to pay for it, rules and regulations weren't even considered. Closest thing to anarcho-capitalism I've ever experienced. Loved it. Folks there were good fun too. So there's that.

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023·edited Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

Thanks Alex. I would say this is a fixed pattern of British statecraft, meaning that if someones pockets are deep and he has no problem being bribed and taking part of one of those London controlled masonic mafias he/she will get away with virtually everything, as an active tool of underground imperial puppetering. However, if someone fights the empire and pursuits the good of his own country and people, if he pursuits peace and international harmony, if he tries to extirpate the mafia networks milking the people, then, he will be presented like Jesuschrist's killer by means of the propaganda machine controlled by the financial imperial mafias, which goal is to undermine the ability of a sovereign country to defend itself using legal violence as one of the attributes of its statehood. This is the primary purpose of political NGOs like Amnesty International which any sovereign country should extirpate from its soil. Deny countries statehood making them failed states. Artists and popstars like Bono contribute to win the populace's hearts as well.

Unfortunately, most of the little countries that have been successful in countering this insidious underground takeover of power by the empire dont have the means to counter this narrative and at best, will face long periods of international ostracism and sanctions, and that if their lucky, notwithstanding their inability to respond to the empire power centres at all. Think about Nicaragua, Cuba or Erythrea for example. Little we know about them. There is no other way out than blocking the blocker, bullying the bully, and striking the striker.

If they are not lucky and finally sucomb to the imperial undercover assaults, then its Lybia, Syria, Irak, Haiti or Yugoslavia.

We have suffered two decades of systematic impunity of imperial agression, gruesome massacres of whole countries that rest unpunished. It was like nothing could stop the hords of bloodthirsty looting imperial cannibals.

What I miss the most in this buddying sovereign states is their capacity to unite the legal use of violence against this insidious undercover masonic attacks to other assymetric methods like media, pop stars, cinema and so on, as well as the ability to strike to the power centres of their irreconcilable enemies. Naive people like the Yugoslavs or the Ukranians were totally deprived of the cognitive tools to even grasp how the empire undercover mafia really works and defend themselves against virtual extermination. And this is an unforgivable historical guilt of people like Tito or Khadafi.

Have a great great year. I am intrigued to read your book and learn more about the British masonic mafia penetrarion methods and blackmail and slander over the ones who fight them, who become their number one enemy, aka, VVP. Cheers.

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023·edited Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

There is no real freedom,..never was! this because Real freedom is balanced by real responsibility & few want the problems inherent in keeping freedom alive!

Listen to some of the quotes from the few people who understood this!

The late political leader,Tip Oneill, said that "all politics is local''

This means that the average citizen is concerned with his/her personal prosperity in the narrow world He/ She lives! The average citizen Is completely involved with their own well being,their own prosperity!

Prosperity,in turn,has little in a positive way to do with what government does or does not do,rather the opposite.The Prosperity is due to advances in productivity since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. This is to say that most citizens are not interested in being Free & Responsible,they just want to be prosperous.If they are prosperous & financially secure they don't give a damn about being Free,they don't care about what the politicians do,what they steal, as long as they are secure in the local world they inhabit!

P.S. The Citizens in Nazi Germany in 1938 were quite Contented living in a dictatorship run by psychopaths because their Standard of living was high.They were not free & didn't care!

,unless they were Jewish,

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

We all understand that Yeltsin was controlled by the West but the intriguing question is under what circumstances did the reigns get passed to Putin? We all recall that Yeltsin's resignation (and naming of the unknown Putin) came as a surprise. Was this Yeltsin's act of defiance against his controllers? Was the transmission planned by the West but then Putin turned against them? Was it all a FSB/KGB operation? I would be inclined to the view that it was an act of defiance by Yeltsin but the part that does not fit was that Putin's position was immediately strengthened by the Ryazan bombings and the Chechen war, which looked very much to be a false flag operation, but whose?

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

Interesting writing Alex. I know that growing up as a teenager in the 80’s it seems like we had ALOT more freedom then. It was the USSR that was so oppressive back then, at least that’s what we always believed. We also had a President that appeared to embrace the ideals of freedom(Reagan). Now, after witnessing the COVID insanity and now the current administration and the deep state racing us into a “banana republic” status, it’s just disheartening to think this is the same U.S.A. that I grew up in. As a professional pilot, this is probably the most lucrative time to be in this profession and the U.S. is the best place to be in this industry. This is still a country where anyone with a few bucks to spare, can get a pilot’s license and theoretically, buy an airplane without an electrical system and fly it from sea to shining sea without a radio and not have to talk to anyone or file a flight plan. I don’t know of ANY other country in the world where that can be done. You can even, theoretically, buy a powered parachute or ultralight aircraft and do the same thing without a license at all. This guy makes a living from it. (https://youtu.be/nzUiFdnd7ZM?si=9aBJ2TtkCr-nrNC1) That being said, I find it completely depressing to see censorship of anything not following the government narrative, personal liberties and constitutional rights vaporized in the name of the illusion of health and safety. It’s really hard to address the two extremes. It’s also really hard to imagine Russia having more freedoms, they did sign on to the same climate accords as the rest of the insane developed world. There are oligarchs everywhere, Russia included. Maybe this is a fight against oligarchs everywhere.

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

Being a German journalist who speaks Russian and been there lot´s of times I´d venture the following:

Russians are born free and stay that way. They are instinctive anarchists. That is why that country easily vears into chaos and that is why tyrannical rule has been the norm. Or put another way: Russians don´t follow rules and laws. They subvert them, ignore them whatever. The government reacts by making ever more complicated laws trying to regulate the smallest things. Finally it really becomes impossible to follow the law and the average Russian is vindicated in his disdain for government. If things must move forward in Russia the government has to use force. A stick for every head as the Russian saying goes. Now that the war has begone the government is using the stick. It used not to be that way. Only 4 years ago you could buy papers at every street corner in Moscow detailing the most incredible corruption and saying the most terrible things about the goverment. Not anymore. Say something negatively in private!!!! about the SMO first time you get a fine and next time it is prison. A month ago some old guy was sentenced to 6 years for holding up a plackard denouncing the SMO.

What about us? The Western man doesn´t need a stick. He has one in the head that tells him to behave and follow the rules. That is why the rule of law and democracy is possible in the first place. That is also why Western journals were always much less daring and outrageous as Russian publications. There is though a moment, when the stick in the head doesn´t work anymore. That time has come and now the Goverment has to turn to Russian methods. Not quite as bad and certainly not as crude as in Russia but they are getting there. They are remote controlling a new configuration of the internal stick.

And of course the hypocrisy of the West knows no bounds regarding Russia. It is ultimately the West who forced the rulers in Russia to resort to the stick. And yes, Russia is still a great place and I love being there. Our woke leaders applying cancel culture to Russia is nothing but a sick joke.

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

If you consult the rights to free speech laid out in the universal declaration of rights following the French Revolution and its counterpart in the EU it is evident that the right is actually a permission conditional on considerations of public order. Whether or not the permission is to be curtailed is to be decided by the government. So criticizing the government is possible if the government graciously permits it.

The British as usual are an anomaly. With no formal rights the subjects of the crown in practice enjoyed a certain liberty of expression in what was for a long time a polite and peaceful society. Now it is a revolutionary state and persecution has naturally followed.

Which leaves the First amendment. A unique achievement in the annals of liberty. Here’s hoping it survives.

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

Yes it appears there is more tolerance in Russia than the mindless madness gripping the West. As an American pal says they talk about freedom as they don’t see any.

Freedom is a delusional concept if it doesn’t include its responsibilities giving it respect.

Expand full comment
Dec 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

You're right Alex, we need to look in the mirror, and not through coloured glasses!

Expand full comment

Went to the redpillpress site and well, no surprise I guess that it said "video is not available in your country" yup home of the land and free my A$$! hahaha

Expand full comment

'math is racist'... 🤣😂

Bonne fete Alex, to you and yours.

Expand full comment

I used to work with a Russian hedge fund. Super smart guys, without all the duplicity of their Wall Street equivalents. Anyway, their principle shareholder was one of the aerospace oligarchs. I never met him but my counterparts would often see him and chat casually with him. Their favorite story was when Putin held a meeting of the major oligarchs, shortly after securing the presidency, telling them all how things were going to be, going forward. Apparently most present were nodding their heads but one (sufficiently audibly) said something like 'We shall see about that'. Apparently a chill hush went around the room and everyone shuffled away from that individual. He was Khodorkovsky, then the richest of them all. The rest is history.

Expand full comment

In some ways they aren't as free. They're pushing mask mandates in areas even though everyone already knows that they don't help and in fact can cause issues.

Why would Russia follow the fake Western science?

Mind you that London, new York and other big cities aren't doing mandates. Are Russians still worried about a flu?

https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/seasons-greetings-from-st-petersburg

Expand full comment