Rare earths deal is a very British hustle, a cheap rerun of Winston Churchill's playbook to ensnare the US in World War 2. Now Starmer's doing it for WW3.
Very insightful article! To me it seems the civil war in which America is in will be played out in Europe where the neocons (Biden admin, WEF,...)still pull the strings of all the EU puppets. Pushing Europe at war with Russia was always their goal after it became obvious that the proxy war in Ukraine is not enough to cause sufficient damage to Russia and weaken it so it cannot join China in a potential war of the US with China. Keeping the US out or Nato and declaring that article 5 would not get triggered at least for the US, reduces the risk for nuclear escalation. The US made a fortune with WW2 and try to repeat that. Their economy and financial situation is in a hopeless state, similar like in Great Depression times, where only a "Great Reset" - WW2 - gave them the chance to escape. This whole show with Trump as "peacemaker" smells like a poorly scripted Hollywood movie. It is very likely just a re-arrangement to extend the proxy war to whole of Europe, fill the pockets of the US by weapon deals and new "land and lease" deals, relocate industry to the US and destroy the EU as competitor to the US in the Western empire.
You need to read more about Trump and what he stands for-- Art of the Deal, interviews etc. Unfortunately too many of my European friends (not sure if you are) don't understand this strain of US political thought. Its always been there-- Tea Party ,MAGA etc-- always been there. Then you wouldn't write this.
"The US made a fortune with WW2 and try to repeat that. Their economy and financial situation is in a hopeless state, similar like in Great Depression times, where only a "Great Reset" - WW2 - gave them the chance to escape. This whole show with Trump as "peacemaker" smells like a poorly scripted Hollywood movie.
BTW DOGE and modernizing OBM etc. will save more (especially going forward ) than what you think the US made in WW2 (it was no tariff/Marshall Plan Europe that made out like bandits). First of all saving all those billions that annually go to the UK and Europe through poorly constructed money laundering programs-- oh well what will they do 🤷♀️ And they are discovering even more every day. 😊
And you need to read some history, European as well as American. Really your comment is risible. I'd go into detail but I can't be bothered. Poor Alex having nonsense like this to contend with. History did not begin with the Tea Party or MAGA.
BTW as a Canadian I know quite a lot about US and European history. Clearly you have no idea about Trump nor the political movement he arose from. Risible 🤣 Lets see how Europe does this year. Good luck
Can anyone explain the presence of disgraced former PM Johnson in all of this, operating on behalf of current Labour government, on his own shilling or by vested corporate interests?
I've always found it fascinating (eyebrow/hair-raising) that BJ's pater Stanley was a "Rockefeller Man" for so much of his career. Makes one wonder about "checking out any time you like, but you can never leave." The Octopus has many far-reaching arms, don't you know . . .
During the Brexshit charade, he was enormously funded and supported by CIA and the Thiel group, to the point where he even humiliated Queen Elizabeth. (He illegitimately prorogued her parliament, and also claimed she supported him, when she decidedly had not).
He is a shill at least for the offshored banking clans, and the US Deep State, and probably several others. A totally amoral hustler with several masters, not a one of them the actual publics he is supposed to have served.
Even his own older brother, an outright clinical psychopath, is disgusted by him.
Seems like the same "influences" have been at work here in Canada. Prorogued parliament is where we are right now as Mark Carney(WEF) runs for Justins job (Boris Johnson with better hair and an undertakers personality) and acts as the fixer for the UK interests that still control us here in Canada.
Watch the next 6 months here to see if we can take some of that " sovereign energy" from the US to find ways to stick it the UK interests that control BoJo and aligns with the WEF.
Excellent points. Why not join the USA? Just think of the strategic advantage, as well as a host of other good things. The Heroic Canadian Truckers took to the roads in 22 to protest forced vaccination to cross the border to the USA. It should be your right. There should be no border. You are English speakers of the same culture, history and identity. Now you are told you have to inject drugs to visit your own brothers? Whose interest does that serve? London's? It seems to me that Canada, Australia and NZ have always been London's Puppets. Only the USA made a serious attempt to break away. But did it? Perhaps Donald Trump is the first, and only, real American President? Wouldn't that be a fine thing? History is on the move. Seize the moment. My advice, if you really want to stick it to UK interests, would be to join the USA as swiftly as you jolly well can while the offer is still on the table. Can you imagine the gnashing of teeth in London if you did that? Call your Mighty Truckers again. A massive convoy to Washington with no passports might do just do it.
Is that the same 'Mark Carney' who was governor of the Bank of England? I noticed when he became a bigwig recently in Canada, none of the UK press mentioned that role in his past.
Unusual to have two people with the same name in the same circles tho.
None of the 5 Eyes countries have a decent alternative left for leader, the collective intel agencies make sure of that. They don't want another rerun of the Corbyn threat to their interests.
Yes, and before that he was BofCanada and also Goldmans, earlier worked in the Department of Finance of Canada while I was a junior economist there (the stories!!) Good friend of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Wife's sister connected with UK elite, Wife benefitting from the largesse of the USAID funding debacle. A real great group of people.
Lots of intelligence leak scandals already on the part of Canadian involvement.
He's the best man for the job. You'd be hard-pressed to find a more immoral asshole than BoJo the Clown who is so aptly loquacious and able to spew so much horseshit.
Very plausible. I hope its true that Trump is looking after U.S. interests, but I fear he's a tool of the G3P. Maybe he is breaking free? That would be nice.
Organizational Chart, Bank for International Settlements Kill Box
Organizational chart by Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic and What is the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P)?
"It was Rothschild Inc. bond trader Wilbur Ross who handled Donald Trump’s bankruptcy. In exchange for the Rothschilds bailing Trump out, Trump agreed to let his name become a lucrative brand for his bankster creditors. Ross was rewarded by becoming Trump’s first Secretary of Commerce. And the Rothschilds picked up the Taj Mahal casino and other Atlantic City properties on the cheap."
I think Trump's alleged connection to Wilbur Ross and Ross' alleged connection to the Rothschild's and the Rothschild's alleged connection to the G3P are all very plausible, although of course proof in a court of law would be preferable.
But as Cicero said, "In times of war, the law is silent".
Trump's "assassination attempt" shows signs to even a non-expert that it was faked. It is doubtful that he could have done that himself, without the deep state, and by extension, the G3P.
Nine signs Trump’s assassination attempt was faked
Psychological operation is aimed at the religious and uncritical, say analysts (Updated 2/3/25)
John Titus has a great series about the Fed, where he explains how it can manipulate the money supply through reserve requirements and asset purchases, how it purchased only bank owned assets after the 2008 global financial crisis because of oversight from congress, and how in 2020 congress was distracted and it looked the other way while the fed purchased trillions in non bank owned assets to prop up the stock market.
He also very clearly explains that the crucial difference between the Fed and the European Central Bank is that, according to the U.S. Constitution, Congress retains money printing power and the Fed is only delegated that power and Congress (supposedly) oversees it and can even revoke it and take back the money printing powers, by law. Titus also explains how the Fed is forever gaslighting the public in saying that it can get better results without political interference, but that is demonstrably false.
So we see the result of the ECB being privately owned but completely politically untouchable in the EU approach to Russia and Ukraine.
Episode 1 - The War for Bankocracy
Brace yourself for another assault on the Constitution
It should be obvious by now that Zelensky is a British asset. Who soothed his wounded ego after the debacle in the Oval Office? Sir Keir, of course. On greeting Zero-ensky, those two were locked in one of those inappropriate groping embraces so often offered by corrupt European elites. Disgusting. The 250th anniversary of Concord and Lexington is coming up on April 19th. Let’s remove the British Empire from our midst once and for all. There is no special relationship, only special manipulation.
There are many tentacles to this British octopus. You'd have to fire half the staff of the NY Times for instance. Plus CEOs of the Washington Post, Bloomberg, NY Post, CNN, WSJ....they're everywhere, like fleas.
It's a two-way octopus. The US is also firmly embedded within the UK structure - see how Brexshit was forced through, and the way that BP was stripped of its UK COE to be replaced with a Texan after Halliburton rigged the blowout in the Mexican Gulf.
Americans are just as psychopathic and manipulative as the Brits.
Killary and Nuland, McCain, Lindsy Graham, Cheney - the US has more than its own fair share of power-hungry psychos.
You haven't a clue I'm afraid. Americans are swimming in British propaganda 24/7 and we're paying for it. Brits are swimming in their own propaganda. Americans don't run British papers and British TV/radio. And judging from British acceptance of the Skripal hoax, their propaganda works very well on their own people.
Hollywood propaganda can be avoided. Just don't watch their crap. You think this is analogous to daily papers and TV news that we rely on every day for our "information?" Wow.
Guardian - now primarily US based (That's where most of their subscriptions come from), especially in online edition.
Times, Sun, now-shuttered NotW - US based Aussie Murdoch.
Telegraph, Mail; - offshored non-doms.
BBC - as revealed recently, funded by USAID. Also most of the profit-arms income comes from the USA.
ITV - most advertising incomes comes from the large US corporates.
GB News - CIA/Thiel/US funded.
And then there's the MAIN source of news for most people under 60 - Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Telegram.
All US based.
So yeah, I do say that a HUGE amount of the daily news disinformation in the UK comes from across the Atlantic, AS WELL AS the long-term destabilising effect of Hollywood.
Exactly-- do you also feel that insidious superiority emanating from some Brits' posts these days that I am feeling (to be clear I am a joint UK/Canadian citizen). You know, that we can't possibly understand or know because their experiences are just so much more-- don't you know.
London took the Scripal Hoax so seriously there were several 'D Notices' slapped on the matter. The few Establishment figures that broke ranks, such as Craig Murray, got hounded until they were slammed into prison for other minor offences - fairly obviously a cover.
Simply questioning the matter on private forums was enough to get 'deplatformed', and reported (In some cases) as a possible "Russian agent".
So when the public are kept in the dark so absolutely, and anti-Russian propaganda is being streamed so extensively, and the alternative story is that Russia was entirely innocent and it was London behind it all... well the right-wing are Nationalists, the liberals don't want to get deplatformed for a foreign demonised "AuThOrItArIaN sTaTe", and the left trusts Big Brother these days.
In any society its usually about 15% that think honesty and accuracy is more important than group think and tribalism, and that drops to 5% when there are extreme sanctions applied for those who non-conform.
But some of us out there took the deplatforming, took the defamation, took the insults and slander, and kept sharing information.
I don't have tons of sympathy for Sergei, he made his bed when he sold out his own country, and can understand why Moscow only made pro-forma moves for his return.
Yulia on the other hand.... well, there's considerable evidence the original attacks of chemical agents were supposed to kill them. And it was simple luck that the combination of MX and novichok may have neutralised the worst elements of both.
I hope she's alive and can come out of "hiding" one day, but I wouldn't bet a rusty tin can on that outcome.
Like I said, you're swimming in your own propaganda. Americans didn't slap those 'D' notices on Skripal propaganda, your own British media did. Interestingly you just made a very strong case that Britain isn't a democracy at all, but rather much closer to North Korea.
Jesus fucking christ. You're as bad as 'Carol Jones'.
Where TF did I say "I'm proud of my country"?? Where TF did I say "My country is the best"??
So you don't know what a "D Notice' is - why didn't you just ask, or even better google? It's where the STATE enforces a National Security censorship order upon all media organisations. It's where the STATE will come and arrest your journalists and close your outlet if you refuse to comply and publish anyway. The STATE, comprendez, not the "media". The STATE, with the secret police, courts, and prisons.
"Interestingly you just made a very strong case that Britain isn't a democracy at all"
No shit, fucking sherlock. You finally got there. Shame that 'Carol Jones' didn't just ask as well. I've been arguing that for several decades, and the treatment of Corbyn simply cemented it.
"but rather much closer to North Korea."
Oh, there's a difference. DPRK has considerably less secrecy and surveillance. The UK state is by far the most secretive country on the planet.
All things considered, it could be debated which of the two had most ACTUAL democracy. They are certainly both authoritarian.
Note -- none of the Americans you site are not only in power, but they have had their security clearances revoked. Meaning no access to anyone who has power
LOL!! I love your projection-- as a joint Perfidious Albion/Canadian citizen, how I DO miss the British superior knowledge of all things. 🤣 Tik tok-- thats the sound of the pending UK sovereign debt crisis....
A perfect Jacobean tragedy in the making ( think : Revenger’sTragedy, Duchess of Malfi, even Titus Andronicus - the stage will be strewn with corpses ere long 😱). Evil machinations, greed , incest, back-stabbing, cannibalism, murder most foul..
I am starting to read your mind, from the title of your articles. Great analysis, and thorough. The entire effort was a setup by the collective Party of War. There's a great staying I use more and more: "The US cannot afford to NOT be at war."
Strangely, we do a similar type of signal generation, that covers the globe. Mainly derivatives driven, but also equities and bonds. We'll discuss at some point, but we have a portfolio generation system we use for clients at www.aegisfund.com Worth checking out when you find time.....thanks for the feedback. We are also a CTA, and my company is based in Ireland. But i'm an American citizen.
Perfidious Albion. Never was a country more aptly named.
Could the British manage to strong arm Trump into the cataclysmically stupid idea of back-stopping the UK's and EU's squaring up to Moscow? Hard to know as Trump weathervanes daily, but since the US still refuses to hear Russia's demands regarding the root causes of the problem even as it tries to play mediator in a conflict it ignited, I wouldn't be surprised. As Churchill said, the US will always try every other option before the right one, and the right one in this instance it to walk away and let the Brits and EU handle the mess.
Trump's achilles heel is that he bends to strong wills, and there's few stronger than the English public school and Israeli trained ones. Tulsi however also seems like one, and she's a patriot well above any loyalty to the UK/general West.
It all depends on who spoke to him last before a decision is made, and whether he has been sufficiently prepared beforehand to weather such intense psychic battles.
Sigh-- wait, just wait. Remember he has done more to expose countries/peoples hidden agendas in little more than a MONTH, than any living govt/person in my 65 years. How about you?
I managed to get a visit from an MI5 psychopath a decade ago who warned me off my activism and social media activism.
This was after I'd helped bring several top MPs down, cost the UK banking industry a cool couple of hundred £m in exposing a tax dodge by Chancellor Osbo, and my words were quoted in Parliament opposing the proposed attack on Syria by PM Scameron that greatly helped the historic 'No' vote.
I've done more than my fair bit.
It would be unlikely that any of my social media posts go unread by various intel agencies, incl the UK, Russian and Iranian ones.
This is only a slightly more interesting time as far as I'm concerned.
My hair has also turned pure white, and was before I was 50.
I've met several top official;s in several countries, gave some of them good advice and others (Figuratively) heart attacks. Queen Elizabeth visited ME.
I've been around, lived a bit.
Alex is one of the few still adding knowledge to my database, for which I am deeply grateful.
Thats great, and like many posters here we have all had our activism make an impact 💗 That is purely off topic. So my question
"Remember he has done more to expose countries/peoples hidden agendas in little more than a MONTH, than any living govt/person in my 65 years. How about you?"
I found a fascinating vignette re: Edvard Beneš written by Martha Gellhorn, then married to E. Hemingway, in the hours preceding the German incursion into the Sudetenland, and of course the Brits were there in all of the perfidious glory to direct the "show" by their absence.
First hand from Gellhorn was the dark mood among the principals in the government, but especially so the Russian ambassador who was in as direct contact as could be with Stalin back in Moscow in those harrowing hours. Stalin was offering direct military aid (Soviet troops-armor--everything) in order to stop the Werhmacht from marching on in, and this came on the heels of Britain and France having given in to Hitler's demands. Each for different reasons from how I've deciphered the story.
But the onus of the current diplomatic effort was upon Stalin's ambassador to get Beneš to accept Soviet stand-alone support, and when he conceded to the Germans, this left Stalin's ambassador concluding his intimate, albeit fatalistic conversation with Gellhorn with the implied prediction that he would join the ranks of the liquidated back in Moscow.
Still so much to re-conclude from those darkest pre-WW II hours, so much intrigue to yet find truthful answers to the questions I once thought satisfied, especially as a most similar set-up is now apparently paralleling 1938, resplendent with Perfidious Albion's characteristic backstabbing in these, our hours. Because in times like these, "A fable, agreed upon," is insufficient, considering what I'm seeing is the end of World War II was never concluded, let alone WW II being a direct result of a WW I that only set the stage for the next chapter(s.
It's been fascinating following you on the podcast circuit over these past months, Alex. Months and now years so suddenly. I'm being nothing but sincere and objective in more than several times wishing for the sickly imitation statesmen of Europe and USA-Canada being replaced by individuals of your intellectual and philisophical caliber, and that of some of your mates and interviewers too proving consistently much more grounded and aware of history, human nature and its consequences of truly awful decisions made in either or both
haste and hubris. Do carry on. Please. A bumpy ride in order to get to the other side is
looking like our constant companion.
So cheers anyway! My motto remains: We were made for these times, otherwise we'd not have been born into them.
One thing to bear in mind about those events: Weimar Germany was bankrupt, we all know the tales of hyperflation etc.
Hitler, who had visited the UK for a few months to live with his brother, reportedly 'disappeared' every day for an extended period during this visit - some believe he was being recruited by you-know-who - comes to power in Germany.
SUDDENLY, Germany is flooded with so much cheap credit, he is able to rebuild a massive German war machine in only a few years.
Where oh where did all that money come from? Shooting a few train drivers to make the trains run on time isn't going to cut it.
There were only 3 countries with that level of spare capital; USA, France, and the UK.
Chamberlain was not "Appeasing Hitler", this was all part of the Plan. The only fly was that German generals were not so stupid as to invade the USSR without implementing Schlieffen first.
The French funded their own invasion. LOLLOL.
What we are taught in schools, and in the corporate media, is a load of baloney.
Only found them about a year ago. I follow his Canadian Patriot YT channel, mostly excellent, and her Substack. His books sound v interesting too, keep meaning to buy.
Well, ~10 years ago I heard it in passing online, and idly started looking into it. Soon discovered the tell-tale giveaway of hysterical denunciations of "Conspiracy Theory!!!" at every pass.
As far as I can tell, some boarding house lady wrote in a letter to a newspaper after the war that before the war a certain distinctive moustache man had stayed at her residence to visit his nearby brother for a while, and she recognized him when the war kicked off. The whole is idea is quite innocuous, after all he was just a private citizen down on his luck, and was not back then the Devil Incarnate breathing hellfire as he is typically painted nowadays.
However, everywhere you encounter the simple idea that Adolf may have visited England, you soon have insanely hysterical denunciations of the entire claim. Far beyond a sane level. And it stinks more than if MI5/Establishment had just gone "Oh, that's interesting if true".
They doth protest too much, as the saying goes.
That's all I know. Makes a lot of sense, if it's all true, however.
There's a link lower down with more supposed information, haven't read it yet, about to.
Thank you. I have gone much deeper into objectivity myself in searching for credibility in these presented-as-inviolable-truth predetermined nostrums regarding our collective history, especially for those utterly and completely demonized. Consigned by those (in power) to utter only an all-encompassing perfidiousness on history's people of influence. So 'They' give us but a one-sided assessment of that we're allowed to only marginally contemplate. For our Owners recognize the primary importance of maintaining "The Narrative." It remains 'Their' first step in keeping what remains of a critically thinking population from becoming restive and asking the hard questions. Ergo: psy-op after psy-op after psy-op.
Sounds like you'd also very much like this short series as well. Every episode has a different angle, written over several years, and yet still has a coherent message.
And right, Germany was getting too big for its britches pre-WW I, and Whitehall couldn't countenance the proposed Bagdhad to Berlin Railway that would have shipped crude oil to Germany over a land route outisde of British influence, especially its naval blockade capabilities.
According to his half sis-in-law, Bridget Hitler, in her auto-bio it was 1912 to 13 that he stayed with them in Liverpool. The self-portait was painted in 1910, so same timeframe. The author and ex head of British Security Coordination William Stephenson confirmed the Liverpool trip in his book A Man Called Intrepid. That gave them 3 yrs to programme him for his future role.
Dang! I read "A Man Called Intrepid" so long ago (early teenaged yrs) that I couldn't remember that passage re: Hitler. I got to know his bio-author (Stevenson's) grandneice via FB. General Zhukov's g-daughter too, coincidentally.
Truth told, I found some of those paintings well worth hanging on my walls, in spite of the Daily Mail's ongoing excoriation of them every other adjective was applying.
So uk has done a secret deal to own all ukraine. but it fears losing all ukraine to russia. which ain't going to happen because russia doesn't want all ukraine.
But still.
So they want America to help stop Russia.
Which America can't do anyway, even if it wanted. It has been doing the best it can do hasn't it?
I don't get it. The two endpoints: Russia takes all Ukraine or America stops Russia, both seem unlikely to me.
They are that lunatic in the UK?
Yes, Maybe. Tell me they are and I might well believe. You know why? Invitations to see the King, that's why. And a boxer's championship belt. These things in all honesty, straight faced, are meant and expected to sway a head of state and influence the course of events that may effect the whole globe?
Well that's lunatic.
But maybe that's just lunatic tactics by those responsible for tactics in an attempt to implement strategy.
And the strategy is to own Ukraine?
No one is going to conquer Russia and no one is going to Balkanise it.
So Ukraine is the prize. They want ukraine?
But I thought the Americans already bought it/stole it. Blackrock, the Bidens, et al.
So is it a fight between UK oligarchs and US oligarchs? Is that what it is?
Alex wrote a great post here. I like it muchly.
But I'm not convinced I know what's going on.
Except he's probably right about the trend. So what do I do? Trade on margin and go long on British Treasuries?
oh, and p.s., isn't it a supposed fact that really there's no economic rare earths in Ukraine? Are they 'rusty destroyers' then?
Agree. Like the third time would be a charm for taking Russia? But I do think some believe it can be done if the US weakens Russia first. One of the first things I thought about this mineral deal is, didn't Zelensky already make a Build Back Better deal with Black Rock? How many times will Zelesnksy sell the same bridge? But I read elsewhere Black Rock gets the Panama Canal, so maybe that was a quiet part of the deal.
The British Empire may certainly be a dream, but IMO more is going on. The EU is moribund, and both seem to want war for a variety of reasons from defaulting on debts to power to riches. I'm sure Zelesnksy's actions were to pin Trump, which was a fail. No doubt the EU/British crowd will try for a false flag now. But a careful reading of Article 5 shows a country can refuse to help under certain conditions. A false flag would be one.
I don't think it even needs a careful reading nor that special conditions are required to obviate helping.
Here's para 1 of the 2 paras:
"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. "
See? Each of them takes such action as it deems necessary. That leaves room for much difference of opinion and action.
I note that 'north atlantic area' too. That remains even though nato seeks to expand to worldwide.
You wrote: "So is it a fight between UK oligarchs and US oligarchs? Is that what it is?"
Yes, I think this must be right, and we are able to see it for a brief moment on TV in the white house because the US oligarchs have lost control of their president.
"Alex wrote a great post here. I like it muchly."
Me too, this is the question we are all asking ourselves and Alex has done the best job trying to answer it. What happened in that meeting was so odd it betrays the truth.
"But I'm not convinced I know what's going on."
Neither am I, but here is my take, for what it may be worth
Some things are more clear, if we stand back a bit. Somebody does not want peace in Ukraine, now, on any terms. That somebody is not Trump. Putin has been clear from the start about what he wants. Z has been promised so much by so many he can't remember his own name. The oddness of the language around the deal "minerals" and "rare earths" betrays UK intelligence. US intelligence would never use English in this way - they prefer Hollywood language - and who even knows what a "mineral" is? My suspicion here is that all those who bought into this war are worried if it stops they lose their investment and so are seriously worried about what was said in those meetings between Trump's people and Putin's people. So for everybody except Putin and Trump it is "war at all costs". Should be fascinating to see what happens next.
Still think all that Zel/Trump drama was just that, something to fill heads and headlines, keep the topic off the jabocide. C'mon folks, don't your know a a production when you see one? You still trust the system?
I came across your writing a while back and took note of how very insightful and intelligent your assessments were. I lost contact for a while and searched for you again. I had difficulty finding your Substack in Google.
You know exactly what is going on, and the powers that be know it, too.
I feel I have a much better understanding of the world after listening to your interview with Glenn Diesen. Bravo on your important work.
Thank you for the information and particularly the timeline which puts events into perspective. Amongst the chaos, events seemed to get lost in the shadows - that is why a timeline is so valuable.
I do wonder where Israel is in all of this? Also that massive US embassy being built in Lebanon?
Alex, I can't thank you enough for your intelligent granular analyses of current events. Brilliant.
Thank you!!
Very insightful article! To me it seems the civil war in which America is in will be played out in Europe where the neocons (Biden admin, WEF,...)still pull the strings of all the EU puppets. Pushing Europe at war with Russia was always their goal after it became obvious that the proxy war in Ukraine is not enough to cause sufficient damage to Russia and weaken it so it cannot join China in a potential war of the US with China. Keeping the US out or Nato and declaring that article 5 would not get triggered at least for the US, reduces the risk for nuclear escalation. The US made a fortune with WW2 and try to repeat that. Their economy and financial situation is in a hopeless state, similar like in Great Depression times, where only a "Great Reset" - WW2 - gave them the chance to escape. This whole show with Trump as "peacemaker" smells like a poorly scripted Hollywood movie. It is very likely just a re-arrangement to extend the proxy war to whole of Europe, fill the pockets of the US by weapon deals and new "land and lease" deals, relocate industry to the US and destroy the EU as competitor to the US in the Western empire.
Thank you!
I do agree.
You need to read more about Trump and what he stands for-- Art of the Deal, interviews etc. Unfortunately too many of my European friends (not sure if you are) don't understand this strain of US political thought. Its always been there-- Tea Party ,MAGA etc-- always been there. Then you wouldn't write this.
"The US made a fortune with WW2 and try to repeat that. Their economy and financial situation is in a hopeless state, similar like in Great Depression times, where only a "Great Reset" - WW2 - gave them the chance to escape. This whole show with Trump as "peacemaker" smells like a poorly scripted Hollywood movie.
BTW DOGE and modernizing OBM etc. will save more (especially going forward ) than what you think the US made in WW2 (it was no tariff/Marshall Plan Europe that made out like bandits). First of all saving all those billions that annually go to the UK and Europe through poorly constructed money laundering programs-- oh well what will they do 🤷♀️ And they are discovering even more every day. 😊
And you need to read some history, European as well as American. Really your comment is risible. I'd go into detail but I can't be bothered. Poor Alex having nonsense like this to contend with. History did not begin with the Tea Party or MAGA.
best to acknowledge that "the victors write the history" don't ya think?
BTW as a Canadian I know quite a lot about US and European history. Clearly you have no idea about Trump nor the political movement he arose from. Risible 🤣 Lets see how Europe does this year. Good luck
Can anyone explain the presence of disgraced former PM Johnson in all of this, operating on behalf of current Labour government, on his own shilling or by vested corporate interests?
That's an excellent question Happy Chappy!
I've always found it fascinating (eyebrow/hair-raising) that BJ's pater Stanley was a "Rockefeller Man" for so much of his career. Makes one wonder about "checking out any time you like, but you can never leave." The Octopus has many far-reaching arms, don't you know . . .
Stanley Johnson was also I believe the author of several books on eugenics. A committed globalist.
Ya and bjs latest going wifey is a Rockefeller beech to boot
I think that someone higher up has Boris Johnson over a barrel. I don't know over what. Some kind of kompromat. He does what he is told to do.
Agreed. Did he nearly die from, of, with, ( choose as necessary) covid? Why does he keep popping up at key moments like a jack in the box?
Almost died but back at work in a couple of weeks. 🤔
And PARTY!
Do you recall the nurse who "saved his life"?
Just think of all the "loans" he has been floated to "dig himself out of trouble"-- and thats what we just know of.
Like Churchill
It can't be this, he's with the conservatives 😲 https://labour25.com/
During the Brexshit charade, he was enormously funded and supported by CIA and the Thiel group, to the point where he even humiliated Queen Elizabeth. (He illegitimately prorogued her parliament, and also claimed she supported him, when she decidedly had not).
He is a shill at least for the offshored banking clans, and the US Deep State, and probably several others. A totally amoral hustler with several masters, not a one of them the actual publics he is supposed to have served.
Even his own older brother, an outright clinical psychopath, is disgusted by him.
But he will die rich, and possibly as an old man.
Seems like the same "influences" have been at work here in Canada. Prorogued parliament is where we are right now as Mark Carney(WEF) runs for Justins job (Boris Johnson with better hair and an undertakers personality) and acts as the fixer for the UK interests that still control us here in Canada.
Watch the next 6 months here to see if we can take some of that " sovereign energy" from the US to find ways to stick it the UK interests that control BoJo and aligns with the WEF.
Excellent points. Why not join the USA? Just think of the strategic advantage, as well as a host of other good things. The Heroic Canadian Truckers took to the roads in 22 to protest forced vaccination to cross the border to the USA. It should be your right. There should be no border. You are English speakers of the same culture, history and identity. Now you are told you have to inject drugs to visit your own brothers? Whose interest does that serve? London's? It seems to me that Canada, Australia and NZ have always been London's Puppets. Only the USA made a serious attempt to break away. But did it? Perhaps Donald Trump is the first, and only, real American President? Wouldn't that be a fine thing? History is on the move. Seize the moment. My advice, if you really want to stick it to UK interests, would be to join the USA as swiftly as you jolly well can while the offer is still on the table. Can you imagine the gnashing of teeth in London if you did that? Call your Mighty Truckers again. A massive convoy to Washington with no passports might do just do it.
Is that the same 'Mark Carney' who was governor of the Bank of England? I noticed when he became a bigwig recently in Canada, none of the UK press mentioned that role in his past.
Unusual to have two people with the same name in the same circles tho.
None of the 5 Eyes countries have a decent alternative left for leader, the collective intel agencies make sure of that. They don't want another rerun of the Corbyn threat to their interests.
Yes, and before that he was BofCanada and also Goldmans, earlier worked in the Department of Finance of Canada while I was a junior economist there (the stories!!) Good friend of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Wife's sister connected with UK elite, Wife benefitting from the largesse of the USAID funding debacle. A real great group of people.
Lots of intelligence leak scandals already on the part of Canadian involvement.
Former high up RCMP intelligence was caught sharing info (tends to be with China here in Canada-- we are heavily infiltrated-- fentanyl, political influence) https://globalnews.ca/news/5899146/senior-rcmp-arrested-charged
Every year a major bust https://globalnews.ca/news/9848048/rcmp-officer-foreign-interference-charge/
Check out the Vatican led Council for Inclusive Capitalism...
Hating the vile old nazis of the wef…
He’s the stoat😶🌫️
He's the best man for the job. You'd be hard-pressed to find a more immoral asshole than BoJo the Clown who is so aptly loquacious and able to spew so much horseshit.
He’s an amoral shape-shifter, the perfect tool for multiple 3 letter agencies, therefore..
Excellent point. Why Bojo and not Roland Rat or Lettuce?
Very plausible. I hope its true that Trump is looking after U.S. interests, but I fear he's a tool of the G3P. Maybe he is breaking free? That would be nice.
Organizational Chart, Bank for International Settlements Kill Box
Organizational chart by Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic and What is the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P)?
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/organizational-chart-bank-for-international
A perspective on Trump worth considering:
"It was Rothschild Inc. bond trader Wilbur Ross who handled Donald Trump’s bankruptcy. In exchange for the Rothschilds bailing Trump out, Trump agreed to let his name become a lucrative brand for his bankster creditors. Ross was rewarded by becoming Trump’s first Secretary of Commerce. And the Rothschilds picked up the Taj Mahal casino and other Atlantic City properties on the cheap."
Rothschild’s Gaza Land Grab
https://www.globalresearch.ca/rothschild-gaza-land-grab
I think Trump's alleged connection to Wilbur Ross and Ross' alleged connection to the Rothschild's and the Rothschild's alleged connection to the G3P are all very plausible, although of course proof in a court of law would be preferable.
But as Cicero said, "In times of war, the law is silent".
Trump's "assassination attempt" shows signs to even a non-expert that it was faked. It is doubtful that he could have done that himself, without the deep state, and by extension, the G3P.
Nine signs Trump’s assassination attempt was faked
Psychological operation is aimed at the religious and uncritical, say analysts (Updated 2/3/25)
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/seven-signs-trumps-assassination
John Titus has a great series about the Fed, where he explains how it can manipulate the money supply through reserve requirements and asset purchases, how it purchased only bank owned assets after the 2008 global financial crisis because of oversight from congress, and how in 2020 congress was distracted and it looked the other way while the fed purchased trillions in non bank owned assets to prop up the stock market.
He also very clearly explains that the crucial difference between the Fed and the European Central Bank is that, according to the U.S. Constitution, Congress retains money printing power and the Fed is only delegated that power and Congress (supposedly) oversees it and can even revoke it and take back the money printing powers, by law. Titus also explains how the Fed is forever gaslighting the public in saying that it can get better results without political interference, but that is demonstrably false.
So we see the result of the ECB being privately owned but completely politically untouchable in the EU approach to Russia and Ukraine.
Episode 1 - The War for Bankocracy
Brace yourself for another assault on the Constitution
https://bestevidence.substack.com/p/episode-1-the-war-for-bankocracy
It should be obvious by now that Zelensky is a British asset. Who soothed his wounded ego after the debacle in the Oval Office? Sir Keir, of course. On greeting Zero-ensky, those two were locked in one of those inappropriate groping embraces so often offered by corrupt European elites. Disgusting. The 250th anniversary of Concord and Lexington is coming up on April 19th. Let’s remove the British Empire from our midst once and for all. There is no special relationship, only special manipulation.
There are many tentacles to this British octopus. You'd have to fire half the staff of the NY Times for instance. Plus CEOs of the Washington Post, Bloomberg, NY Post, CNN, WSJ....they're everywhere, like fleas.
It's a two-way octopus. The US is also firmly embedded within the UK structure - see how Brexshit was forced through, and the way that BP was stripped of its UK COE to be replaced with a Texan after Halliburton rigged the blowout in the Mexican Gulf.
Americans are just as psychopathic and manipulative as the Brits.
Killary and Nuland, McCain, Lindsy Graham, Cheney - the US has more than its own fair share of power-hungry psychos.
You haven't a clue I'm afraid. Americans are swimming in British propaganda 24/7 and we're paying for it. Brits are swimming in their own propaganda. Americans don't run British papers and British TV/radio. And judging from British acceptance of the Skripal hoax, their propaganda works very well on their own people.
The UK is also deeply basted in Hollywood propaganda, and I can't imagine why you would think this wasn't so.
The UK and US are both ruled by the same interests, we are both tentacles of the same 'transatlantic' elites.
You can make it a competition if you like, meh.
Hollywood propaganda can be avoided. Just don't watch their crap. You think this is analogous to daily papers and TV news that we rely on every day for our "information?" Wow.
Guardian - now primarily US based (That's where most of their subscriptions come from), especially in online edition.
Times, Sun, now-shuttered NotW - US based Aussie Murdoch.
Telegraph, Mail; - offshored non-doms.
BBC - as revealed recently, funded by USAID. Also most of the profit-arms income comes from the USA.
ITV - most advertising incomes comes from the large US corporates.
GB News - CIA/Thiel/US funded.
And then there's the MAIN source of news for most people under 60 - Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Telegram.
All US based.
So yeah, I do say that a HUGE amount of the daily news disinformation in the UK comes from across the Atlantic, AS WELL AS the long-term destabilising effect of Hollywood.
Exactly-- do you also feel that insidious superiority emanating from some Brits' posts these days that I am feeling (to be clear I am a joint UK/Canadian citizen). You know, that we can't possibly understand or know because their experiences are just so much more-- don't you know.
I just assume they're MI6/Integrity Initiative bots
London took the Scripal Hoax so seriously there were several 'D Notices' slapped on the matter. The few Establishment figures that broke ranks, such as Craig Murray, got hounded until they were slammed into prison for other minor offences - fairly obviously a cover.
Simply questioning the matter on private forums was enough to get 'deplatformed', and reported (In some cases) as a possible "Russian agent".
So when the public are kept in the dark so absolutely, and anti-Russian propaganda is being streamed so extensively, and the alternative story is that Russia was entirely innocent and it was London behind it all... well the right-wing are Nationalists, the liberals don't want to get deplatformed for a foreign demonised "AuThOrItArIaN sTaTe", and the left trusts Big Brother these days.
In any society its usually about 15% that think honesty and accuracy is more important than group think and tribalism, and that drops to 5% when there are extreme sanctions applied for those who non-conform.
But some of us out there took the deplatforming, took the defamation, took the insults and slander, and kept sharing information.
I don't have tons of sympathy for Sergei, he made his bed when he sold out his own country, and can understand why Moscow only made pro-forma moves for his return.
Yulia on the other hand.... well, there's considerable evidence the original attacks of chemical agents were supposed to kill them. And it was simple luck that the combination of MX and novichok may have neutralised the worst elements of both.
I hope she's alive and can come out of "hiding" one day, but I wouldn't bet a rusty tin can on that outcome.
Like I said, you're swimming in your own propaganda. Americans didn't slap those 'D' notices on Skripal propaganda, your own British media did. Interestingly you just made a very strong case that Britain isn't a democracy at all, but rather much closer to North Korea.
Jesus fucking christ. You're as bad as 'Carol Jones'.
Where TF did I say "I'm proud of my country"?? Where TF did I say "My country is the best"??
So you don't know what a "D Notice' is - why didn't you just ask, or even better google? It's where the STATE enforces a National Security censorship order upon all media organisations. It's where the STATE will come and arrest your journalists and close your outlet if you refuse to comply and publish anyway. The STATE, comprendez, not the "media". The STATE, with the secret police, courts, and prisons.
"Interestingly you just made a very strong case that Britain isn't a democracy at all"
No shit, fucking sherlock. You finally got there. Shame that 'Carol Jones' didn't just ask as well. I've been arguing that for several decades, and the treatment of Corbyn simply cemented it.
"but rather much closer to North Korea."
Oh, there's a difference. DPRK has considerably less secrecy and surveillance. The UK state is by far the most secretive country on the planet.
All things considered, it could be debated which of the two had most ACTUAL democracy. They are certainly both authoritarian.
Note -- none of the Americans you site are not only in power, but they have had their security clearances revoked. Meaning no access to anyone who has power
And a good move that was too. Nonetheless, the idea that those people don't still have access is charmingly naive.
"It's a club, and..." etc.
LOL!! I love your projection-- as a joint Perfidious Albion/Canadian citizen, how I DO miss the British superior knowledge of all things. 🤣 Tik tok-- thats the sound of the pending UK sovereign debt crisis....
Start the purge, I say.
Or rats
Ya nepotism rules… caste and classzzz vomit
I completely agree with you disnfoNation ( great name). Those "embraces" are almost too awful to watch. USA,USA,USA.
A perfect Jacobean tragedy in the making ( think : Revenger’sTragedy, Duchess of Malfi, even Titus Andronicus - the stage will be strewn with corpses ere long 😱). Evil machinations, greed , incest, back-stabbing, cannibalism, murder most foul..
Quite right. All very Machiavellian indeed, complete with bojo the sinister clown.
I am starting to read your mind, from the title of your articles. Great analysis, and thorough. The entire effort was a setup by the collective Party of War. There's a great staying I use more and more: "The US cannot afford to NOT be at war."
Strangely, we do a similar type of signal generation, that covers the globe. Mainly derivatives driven, but also equities and bonds. We'll discuss at some point, but we have a portfolio generation system we use for clients at www.aegisfund.com Worth checking out when you find time.....thanks for the feedback. We are also a CTA, and my company is based in Ireland. But i'm an American citizen.
Perfidious Albion. Never was a country more aptly named.
Could the British manage to strong arm Trump into the cataclysmically stupid idea of back-stopping the UK's and EU's squaring up to Moscow? Hard to know as Trump weathervanes daily, but since the US still refuses to hear Russia's demands regarding the root causes of the problem even as it tries to play mediator in a conflict it ignited, I wouldn't be surprised. As Churchill said, the US will always try every other option before the right one, and the right one in this instance it to walk away and let the Brits and EU handle the mess.
Don't underestimate Trump. The fact the US hasn't already signed and continues to Troll the UK and Zelensky should give you a clue.
Trump's achilles heel is that he bends to strong wills, and there's few stronger than the English public school and Israeli trained ones. Tulsi however also seems like one, and she's a patriot well above any loyalty to the UK/general West.
It all depends on who spoke to him last before a decision is made, and whether he has been sufficiently prepared beforehand to weather such intense psychic battles.
Time will tell. :/
Sigh-- wait, just wait. Remember he has done more to expose countries/peoples hidden agendas in little more than a MONTH, than any living govt/person in my 65 years. How about you?
I managed to get a visit from an MI5 psychopath a decade ago who warned me off my activism and social media activism.
This was after I'd helped bring several top MPs down, cost the UK banking industry a cool couple of hundred £m in exposing a tax dodge by Chancellor Osbo, and my words were quoted in Parliament opposing the proposed attack on Syria by PM Scameron that greatly helped the historic 'No' vote.
I've done more than my fair bit.
It would be unlikely that any of my social media posts go unread by various intel agencies, incl the UK, Russian and Iranian ones.
This is only a slightly more interesting time as far as I'm concerned.
My hair has also turned pure white, and was before I was 50.
I've met several top official;s in several countries, gave some of them good advice and others (Figuratively) heart attacks. Queen Elizabeth visited ME.
I've been around, lived a bit.
Alex is one of the few still adding knowledge to my database, for which I am deeply grateful.
Thats great, and like many posters here we have all had our activism make an impact 💗 That is purely off topic. So my question
"Remember he has done more to expose countries/peoples hidden agendas in little more than a MONTH, than any living govt/person in my 65 years. How about you?"
Then I don't understand your question.
I guess not-- Didnt hear that you exposed the UK govt in a month
*Alex, brilliant analysis.
*This video MUST BE VIEWED by Donald Trump and Co. at the Oval Office.
*Otherwise, they could be deliberately misled once again by false INTEL information🗣️💩📢
Bonne continuation.
CY
Thank you CY!
Let’s not forget who burned Trump in the first go around the Steel dossie wasn’t that MI six did he work for the UK? Hillary’s buddy?
Let's hope his vindictiveness overwhelms his receptivity to flattery.
I found a fascinating vignette re: Edvard Beneš written by Martha Gellhorn, then married to E. Hemingway, in the hours preceding the German incursion into the Sudetenland, and of course the Brits were there in all of the perfidious glory to direct the "show" by their absence.
First hand from Gellhorn was the dark mood among the principals in the government, but especially so the Russian ambassador who was in as direct contact as could be with Stalin back in Moscow in those harrowing hours. Stalin was offering direct military aid (Soviet troops-armor--everything) in order to stop the Werhmacht from marching on in, and this came on the heels of Britain and France having given in to Hitler's demands. Each for different reasons from how I've deciphered the story.
But the onus of the current diplomatic effort was upon Stalin's ambassador to get Beneš to accept Soviet stand-alone support, and when he conceded to the Germans, this left Stalin's ambassador concluding his intimate, albeit fatalistic conversation with Gellhorn with the implied prediction that he would join the ranks of the liquidated back in Moscow.
Still so much to re-conclude from those darkest pre-WW II hours, so much intrigue to yet find truthful answers to the questions I once thought satisfied, especially as a most similar set-up is now apparently paralleling 1938, resplendent with Perfidious Albion's characteristic backstabbing in these, our hours. Because in times like these, "A fable, agreed upon," is insufficient, considering what I'm seeing is the end of World War II was never concluded, let alone WW II being a direct result of a WW I that only set the stage for the next chapter(s.
It's been fascinating following you on the podcast circuit over these past months, Alex. Months and now years so suddenly. I'm being nothing but sincere and objective in more than several times wishing for the sickly imitation statesmen of Europe and USA-Canada being replaced by individuals of your intellectual and philisophical caliber, and that of some of your mates and interviewers too proving consistently much more grounded and aware of history, human nature and its consequences of truly awful decisions made in either or both
haste and hubris. Do carry on. Please. A bumpy ride in order to get to the other side is
looking like our constant companion.
So cheers anyway! My motto remains: We were made for these times, otherwise we'd not have been born into them.
One thing to bear in mind about those events: Weimar Germany was bankrupt, we all know the tales of hyperflation etc.
Hitler, who had visited the UK for a few months to live with his brother, reportedly 'disappeared' every day for an extended period during this visit - some believe he was being recruited by you-know-who - comes to power in Germany.
SUDDENLY, Germany is flooded with so much cheap credit, he is able to rebuild a massive German war machine in only a few years.
Where oh where did all that money come from? Shooting a few train drivers to make the trains run on time isn't going to cut it.
There were only 3 countries with that level of spare capital; USA, France, and the UK.
Chamberlain was not "Appeasing Hitler", this was all part of the Plan. The only fly was that German generals were not so stupid as to invade the USSR without implementing Schlieffen first.
The French funded their own invasion. LOLLOL.
What we are taught in schools, and in the corporate media, is a load of baloney.
Matt Ehret, Canadian geo political analyst, found Hitler was a British agent, who may have been MK Ultra mind programmed at Tavistock. There is a famous self-portait of Hitler sitting on the bridge at Tavistock. https://open.substack.com/pub/neveragainisnowglobal/p/the-tavistock-hitler-connection?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1h5sww
I've followed Matt and Cynthia for over a decade now. They are a formidable force!
Only found them about a year ago. I follow his Canadian Patriot YT channel, mostly excellent, and her Substack. His books sound v interesting too, keep meaning to buy.
My only problem w/ Matt and Cynthia is they are both so prolific. I feel guilty for much of it that I just can't get to.
I'd like to hear more about Hitler's visit to his brother. That one slipped my knowledge. Must have been sometime in the early to mid 1920s, hmm?
Well, ~10 years ago I heard it in passing online, and idly started looking into it. Soon discovered the tell-tale giveaway of hysterical denunciations of "Conspiracy Theory!!!" at every pass.
As far as I can tell, some boarding house lady wrote in a letter to a newspaper after the war that before the war a certain distinctive moustache man had stayed at her residence to visit his nearby brother for a while, and she recognized him when the war kicked off. The whole is idea is quite innocuous, after all he was just a private citizen down on his luck, and was not back then the Devil Incarnate breathing hellfire as he is typically painted nowadays.
However, everywhere you encounter the simple idea that Adolf may have visited England, you soon have insanely hysterical denunciations of the entire claim. Far beyond a sane level. And it stinks more than if MI5/Establishment had just gone "Oh, that's interesting if true".
They doth protest too much, as the saying goes.
That's all I know. Makes a lot of sense, if it's all true, however.
There's a link lower down with more supposed information, haven't read it yet, about to.
Thank you. I have gone much deeper into objectivity myself in searching for credibility in these presented-as-inviolable-truth predetermined nostrums regarding our collective history, especially for those utterly and completely demonized. Consigned by those (in power) to utter only an all-encompassing perfidiousness on history's people of influence. So 'They' give us but a one-sided assessment of that we're allowed to only marginally contemplate. For our Owners recognize the primary importance of maintaining "The Narrative." It remains 'Their' first step in keeping what remains of a critically thinking population from becoming restive and asking the hard questions. Ergo: psy-op after psy-op after psy-op.
The larger Psy-Op über Alles.
Sounds like you'd also very much like this short series as well. Every episode has a different angle, written over several years, and yet still has a coherent message.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA5PlJiqOnk&list=PLv--V1yc2QDJi6hFNhur3iAsyFpXRtB8w
Many thanks. This has turned into one of the most productive threads I've been in on for quite some time. I do appreciate your input.
And right, Germany was getting too big for its britches pre-WW I, and Whitehall couldn't countenance the proposed Bagdhad to Berlin Railway that would have shipped crude oil to Germany over a land route outisde of British influence, especially its naval blockade capabilities.
According to his half sis-in-law, Bridget Hitler, in her auto-bio it was 1912 to 13 that he stayed with them in Liverpool. The self-portait was painted in 1910, so same timeframe. The author and ex head of British Security Coordination William Stephenson confirmed the Liverpool trip in his book A Man Called Intrepid. That gave them 3 yrs to programme him for his future role.
Dang! I read "A Man Called Intrepid" so long ago (early teenaged yrs) that I couldn't remember that passage re: Hitler. I got to know his bio-author (Stevenson's) grandneice via FB. General Zhukov's g-daughter too, coincidentally.
Truth told, I found some of those paintings well worth hanging on my walls, in spite of the Daily Mail's ongoing excoriation of them every other adjective was applying.
good stuff, I learned a lot today.
Great post love " Perfidious Albion's characteristic backstabbing" -- it would make a great book title
Hear hear to " We were made for these times, otherwise we'd not hAve been born into them" 💗
So uk has done a secret deal to own all ukraine. but it fears losing all ukraine to russia. which ain't going to happen because russia doesn't want all ukraine.
But still.
So they want America to help stop Russia.
Which America can't do anyway, even if it wanted. It has been doing the best it can do hasn't it?
I don't get it. The two endpoints: Russia takes all Ukraine or America stops Russia, both seem unlikely to me.
They are that lunatic in the UK?
Yes, Maybe. Tell me they are and I might well believe. You know why? Invitations to see the King, that's why. And a boxer's championship belt. These things in all honesty, straight faced, are meant and expected to sway a head of state and influence the course of events that may effect the whole globe?
Well that's lunatic.
But maybe that's just lunatic tactics by those responsible for tactics in an attempt to implement strategy.
And the strategy is to own Ukraine?
No one is going to conquer Russia and no one is going to Balkanise it.
So Ukraine is the prize. They want ukraine?
But I thought the Americans already bought it/stole it. Blackrock, the Bidens, et al.
So is it a fight between UK oligarchs and US oligarchs? Is that what it is?
Alex wrote a great post here. I like it muchly.
But I'm not convinced I know what's going on.
Except he's probably right about the trend. So what do I do? Trade on margin and go long on British Treasuries?
oh, and p.s., isn't it a supposed fact that really there's no economic rare earths in Ukraine? Are they 'rusty destroyers' then?
Agree. Like the third time would be a charm for taking Russia? But I do think some believe it can be done if the US weakens Russia first. One of the first things I thought about this mineral deal is, didn't Zelensky already make a Build Back Better deal with Black Rock? How many times will Zelesnksy sell the same bridge? But I read elsewhere Black Rock gets the Panama Canal, so maybe that was a quiet part of the deal.
The British Empire may certainly be a dream, but IMO more is going on. The EU is moribund, and both seem to want war for a variety of reasons from defaulting on debts to power to riches. I'm sure Zelesnksy's actions were to pin Trump, which was a fail. No doubt the EU/British crowd will try for a false flag now. But a careful reading of Article 5 shows a country can refuse to help under certain conditions. A false flag would be one.
I don't think it even needs a careful reading nor that special conditions are required to obviate helping.
Here's para 1 of the 2 paras:
"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. "
See? Each of them takes such action as it deems necessary. That leaves room for much difference of opinion and action.
I note that 'north atlantic area' too. That remains even though nato seeks to expand to worldwide.
"as it deems necessary" That's what I mean by a careful reading. Most skip that phrase.
okay. right. never underestimate the stupidity of the masses or their 'leaders'.
Yep. And you are right about "north atlantic area" and expansion.
Goal: To dismember Russia. Purposes: For financial leverage in a desperately overleveraged financial system; to remove a strategic adversary.
Ukraine: potential tool to achieve dismemberment of Russia; short term extra financial leverage.
USA: Muppets who will do most of the fighting now the UK elite doesn't have millions of brown folk to do the mass dying for them.
Ukraine is the 'Microwave oven won when you missed winning the luxury car' on the game show.
Problem is for you is that the Muppet show is over
That's not a problem for ME. In fact, I'm over the moon if Trump takes all this down.
great post and a good summary ,, thanks
You wrote: "So is it a fight between UK oligarchs and US oligarchs? Is that what it is?"
Yes, I think this must be right, and we are able to see it for a brief moment on TV in the white house because the US oligarchs have lost control of their president.
"Alex wrote a great post here. I like it muchly."
Me too, this is the question we are all asking ourselves and Alex has done the best job trying to answer it. What happened in that meeting was so odd it betrays the truth.
"But I'm not convinced I know what's going on."
Neither am I, but here is my take, for what it may be worth
Some things are more clear, if we stand back a bit. Somebody does not want peace in Ukraine, now, on any terms. That somebody is not Trump. Putin has been clear from the start about what he wants. Z has been promised so much by so many he can't remember his own name. The oddness of the language around the deal "minerals" and "rare earths" betrays UK intelligence. US intelligence would never use English in this way - they prefer Hollywood language - and who even knows what a "mineral" is? My suspicion here is that all those who bought into this war are worried if it stops they lose their investment and so are seriously worried about what was said in those meetings between Trump's people and Putin's people. So for everybody except Putin and Trump it is "war at all costs". Should be fascinating to see what happens next.
A lot of assumptions in your post 🤔🤔🤔
So what? What are they and do they matter and are they justifiable and appropriate in context? :)
no
so you decline to show them, say they do not matter, say they are not justifiable and say they are not appropriate?
I'm thinking I could level those same assertions at your post.
Still think all that Zel/Trump drama was just that, something to fill heads and headlines, keep the topic off the jabocide. C'mon folks, don't your know a a production when you see one? You still trust the system?
They are both actors after all and that did seem to be highly theatrical.
Dear Alex,
I came across your writing a while back and took note of how very insightful and intelligent your assessments were. I lost contact for a while and searched for you again. I had difficulty finding your Substack in Google.
You know exactly what is going on, and the powers that be know it, too.
I feel I have a much better understanding of the world after listening to your interview with Glenn Diesen. Bravo on your important work.
Outstanding cogent, thorough discussion thank you so very much Alex.
Thank you Aloe!
Churchill was a dreadful, truly dreadful man.
Thank you for the information and particularly the timeline which puts events into perspective. Amongst the chaos, events seemed to get lost in the shadows - that is why a timeline is so valuable.
I do wonder where Israel is in all of this? Also that massive US embassy being built in Lebanon?
Great time line, agreed