Sure Alex, it just brings the difference to light between inductive and deductive reasoning, the first is the in the West highly appreciated but so often false Aristotelian method that endeavors to come to an understanding of nature by a continued process of trial and error. It is a pity that we hurt ourselves so much by thinking in a ra…
Sure Alex, it just brings the difference to light between inductive and deductive reasoning, the first is the in the West highly appreciated but so often false Aristotelian method that endeavors to come to an understanding of nature by a continued process of trial and error. It is a pity that we hurt ourselves so much by thinking in a rather destructive way. At one point all universities have to address their views on research.
Most of us do not realize in how much karmic mud we stick only through condoning research on living animals for potions and pills. The elites who always have mocked the use of herbs and natural healing in favor of pharmaceutical poison, are very much to blame. And so we have an unhappy and unhealthy karma which we pass on to our unlucky descendants, until we find it enough and then change will come. But then there still remains a bill for the millions (billions?) of duped apes, mice and other vermin, that were decades long tortured in labs worldwide in incredible horrible ways. The universe will never forget or forgive, there will come a moment the bill will have to be paid in full, the cup of poison has to be emptied to the last drop. Perhaps we have arrived at that moment now and we are waiting for the cashier?
Agreed; I think that running cruel and unnecessary experiments on other living beings is one of the saddest and most heartbreaking transgressions of our western ways. Same with factory farming. We produce large quantities of low quality stuff; we destroy much in the process and little satisfaction from it. And the anointed "experts" then tell us that this is all for the best. But I think that deep down we all know it is not.
Sure Alex, it just brings the difference to light between inductive and deductive reasoning, the first is the in the West highly appreciated but so often false Aristotelian method that endeavors to come to an understanding of nature by a continued process of trial and error. It is a pity that we hurt ourselves so much by thinking in a rather destructive way. At one point all universities have to address their views on research.
Most of us do not realize in how much karmic mud we stick only through condoning research on living animals for potions and pills. The elites who always have mocked the use of herbs and natural healing in favor of pharmaceutical poison, are very much to blame. And so we have an unhappy and unhealthy karma which we pass on to our unlucky descendants, until we find it enough and then change will come. But then there still remains a bill for the millions (billions?) of duped apes, mice and other vermin, that were decades long tortured in labs worldwide in incredible horrible ways. The universe will never forget or forgive, there will come a moment the bill will have to be paid in full, the cup of poison has to be emptied to the last drop. Perhaps we have arrived at that moment now and we are waiting for the cashier?
Agreed; I think that running cruel and unnecessary experiments on other living beings is one of the saddest and most heartbreaking transgressions of our western ways. Same with factory farming. We produce large quantities of low quality stuff; we destroy much in the process and little satisfaction from it. And the anointed "experts" then tell us that this is all for the best. But I think that deep down we all know it is not.
Excellent conclusion!