Your remark makes sense - I understand where you come from. However, no - I don't think they intended a defeat in Ukraine. It's only that they are proceeding with their hare-brained schemes in spite of the defeat. Like drunken gamblers, instead of cutting their losses, they'll sooner accept total ruin.
think about it.....what are they doing with the money from the bank run....? Parking it in JPMorgan et al, just like it was parked at SVB. What was the "run" for anyways? One of the customers mentioned in the press who participated (instigated?) the public run, has only one or two degrees of separation from the entirety of the important people in silicon valley, the industry!
Truth is always the first casualty in any conflict. With all the boomerangs on Biden, I believe that Trump controls the FED. Do not know how of course, but that is my take at this time. Yellen is obviously not quite up to the job IMHO. It now seems that the Treasury has been combined with the Fed and with the Bail out of the "Chosen" Banks which will only allow 'Second Tier" Banks to join the Chosen Banks if they do NOT hold any Crypto currency. Getting prepared to get the "Bank Cryptoset up with NO competition and full control where you shop, what you buy etc. My 2 cents worth.
Focus on truth? They held an "election" in the US, Nov. 2022. The war was not even in the top 10 of voter concerns as per the "polls". Truth? "Woke" will be the key parameter deciding the next election, like "ability to have a beer with.." was for W Bush. Trump is also a shiny toy. This is Murica!
"Elections" are certainly part of the Great Con. When I used to vote for president, it was always for the lesser of two evils. I hated two bad options and finally quit voting. People assume that if I don't vote for one of the presidential candidates, that automatically means I back the other. Nonsense. I have (Dem) (ex) friends who spout, in auto-robot language, "If you don't vote, you don't have any right to complain." None seems to see that even before computerized, digital voting, elections were rigged; that candidates have always been part of the Super State and they are beholden to the globalist, parasite class.
I remember the "Have a beer with" GWB line (LOL) and, at the time, thought, Who cannot see through this most simple of ad psychology slogans? Of course, I looked at the planes hitting the World Trade Towers and said out loud, on that day, to my office staff, "Cheney is behind this." Who couldn't see that right away?"
I too have arrived at the same election conclusion. Every election I voted in from 88' until 22' was always the "lessor of 2 evils", never for someone I believed in. Whenever I'd complain to family or friends was rebuffed with the argument, "not voting is a vote for the other side". I now see that my "not voting" going forward, if I choose not to, it is still a vote, only its a vote of no confidence in either candidate. I'm waiting to make my decision for 24' once I see who's on the ticket. If its Trump,(whom I voted for in 16' & 20') then I'm not voting because he's proven to me He's just an establishment stooge for the CNP. The VAX is a non starter for me.
Well ... it's better than Russia where Putin attempts to assassinate his opponents. BTW, there are many more elections than President which are consequential... State governor, senator, Congressman, etc... The President has power... but so do the other levels of government.
It amazes one to imagine they still contemplate they are negotiating from a position of power, and how's the maximum pressure thing been working out? Not so good from my viewpoint.
Thank you, Alex......I just wish you extend your analysis. The end always seems to cut short your discussion. As for the truth....well, this is, of course, an interesting aspect. One might want to say that to talk about truth is always problematic, since it involves a split, so to speak - a split between a conceptual and empirical notion. But that would be, of course, another article. 😇
What if I were to suggest that WW3 may start over pedophile adoption rights?
The record shows that Russia went from a country worthy of a "reset" (Hillary, 2012) to the world's supervillain overnight (2014). What happened?
Russia in 2013 put the kibosh on pedos traveling there to adopt their kids and abuse them is what happened.
Obviously, this motivation for war cannot be mentioned in polite company. So we get the usual squid ink: He's a thug, a dictator, jails his opponents, etc. etc.
The record is there. The Deep State wasn't particularly interested in Ukraine in 2010, 2011, 2012. Suddenly in 2014 it was priority one for Cookies Nuland, Kinzinger and the rest of 'em. Draw your own conclusions.
You provide zero proof for your assertions. I can provide lots of proof why "Russophobia" exists... BTW, it's not a "fear" of Russians, it's disdain.
Vladimir Putin was installed as President because he promised not to double-cross Yeltsin and have him prosecuted for corruption.
In order to win favour with the blood-thirsty Russians, he blew up three apartment buildings in Russia as a false-flag operation to harness anger to reignite the Second Chechen War.
Georgia and Ukraine wanted to join NATO but were rebuffed... so not to "offend" Vladimir Putin. Months later, Russian troops invaded Georgia.
In 2014, Putin's stooge, Yanukovych, who was installed after a fraudulent election, flew the coop back to Moscow. Enraged, Putin fomented trouble in the Donbas and Crimea. Putin's "Little Green Men" (AKA Russian Spetznaz) invaded Crimea. Putin then staged a phony "Referendum"... A la Sudetenland... Just like the Fuhrer did in 1938.
Notice how Russia talks a tough game against Poland and the Baltic countries yet dares not set one foot there because he knows Article 5 would be invoked.
So, your "Russophobia" analysis is bullshit. Funny how those closest to Russia are the most "Russophobic". They have a long memory of Russia's territorial designs and imperial aspirations.
ChatGPT: please write me an essay that parrots the talking points of the neo-con mainstream media in regards to the sentiments that westerners must have toward Russia in order to justify WW3.
John 8:32
"and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free."
Not much more complicated than that.
Amen!
Isn't all of this rather intentional? Great opportunity for consolidation and takeover by Central banks and their carbon credit currency?
Your remark makes sense - I understand where you come from. However, no - I don't think they intended a defeat in Ukraine. It's only that they are proceeding with their hare-brained schemes in spite of the defeat. Like drunken gamblers, instead of cutting their losses, they'll sooner accept total ruin.
Oh I pray daily to God that this is true Alex
think about it.....what are they doing with the money from the bank run....? Parking it in JPMorgan et al, just like it was parked at SVB. What was the "run" for anyways? One of the customers mentioned in the press who participated (instigated?) the public run, has only one or two degrees of separation from the entirety of the important people in silicon valley, the industry!
Damn, that's a good piece. Thank you, Sasha.
Many thanks Jolyon! =)
Truth is always the first casualty in any conflict. With all the boomerangs on Biden, I believe that Trump controls the FED. Do not know how of course, but that is my take at this time. Yellen is obviously not quite up to the job IMHO. It now seems that the Treasury has been combined with the Fed and with the Bail out of the "Chosen" Banks which will only allow 'Second Tier" Banks to join the Chosen Banks if they do NOT hold any Crypto currency. Getting prepared to get the "Bank Cryptoset up with NO competition and full control where you shop, what you buy etc. My 2 cents worth.
The old Man
Focus on truth? They held an "election" in the US, Nov. 2022. The war was not even in the top 10 of voter concerns as per the "polls". Truth? "Woke" will be the key parameter deciding the next election, like "ability to have a beer with.." was for W Bush. Trump is also a shiny toy. This is Murica!
"Elections" are certainly part of the Great Con. When I used to vote for president, it was always for the lesser of two evils. I hated two bad options and finally quit voting. People assume that if I don't vote for one of the presidential candidates, that automatically means I back the other. Nonsense. I have (Dem) (ex) friends who spout, in auto-robot language, "If you don't vote, you don't have any right to complain." None seems to see that even before computerized, digital voting, elections were rigged; that candidates have always been part of the Super State and they are beholden to the globalist, parasite class.
I remember the "Have a beer with" GWB line (LOL) and, at the time, thought, Who cannot see through this most simple of ad psychology slogans? Of course, I looked at the planes hitting the World Trade Towers and said out loud, on that day, to my office staff, "Cheney is behind this." Who couldn't see that right away?"
Chapeau, Natalie! It took me 2 or 2 weeks to work out that 911 was an inside job, after I came upon the PNAC manifesto.
Wear your tin-foil hat sir...
Name calling suggests an absence of factual counter information.
I too have arrived at the same election conclusion. Every election I voted in from 88' until 22' was always the "lessor of 2 evils", never for someone I believed in. Whenever I'd complain to family or friends was rebuffed with the argument, "not voting is a vote for the other side". I now see that my "not voting" going forward, if I choose not to, it is still a vote, only its a vote of no confidence in either candidate. I'm waiting to make my decision for 24' once I see who's on the ticket. If its Trump,(whom I voted for in 16' & 20') then I'm not voting because he's proven to me He's just an establishment stooge for the CNP. The VAX is a non starter for me.
Well ... it's better than Russia where Putin attempts to assassinate his opponents. BTW, there are many more elections than President which are consequential... State governor, senator, Congressman, etc... The President has power... but so do the other levels of government.
It amazes one to imagine they still contemplate they are negotiating from a position of power, and how's the maximum pressure thing been working out? Not so good from my viewpoint.
Thank you, Alex......I just wish you extend your analysis. The end always seems to cut short your discussion. As for the truth....well, this is, of course, an interesting aspect. One might want to say that to talk about truth is always problematic, since it involves a split, so to speak - a split between a conceptual and empirical notion. But that would be, of course, another article. 😇
Thank you Lubica. I try to keep my article as short as possible - discussiin could fill an entire book!
Alex, you have an excellent command of the English language. I love your joint appearances with Tom Luongo.
Tbank you Greg, I really appreciate the kind feedback, cheers!
Sometimes I suspect they know the real truth but prefer to proceed on alternative versions publicly.
What if I were to suggest that WW3 may start over pedophile adoption rights?
The record shows that Russia went from a country worthy of a "reset" (Hillary, 2012) to the world's supervillain overnight (2014). What happened?
Russia in 2013 put the kibosh on pedos traveling there to adopt their kids and abuse them is what happened.
Obviously, this motivation for war cannot be mentioned in polite company. So we get the usual squid ink: He's a thug, a dictator, jails his opponents, etc. etc.
The record is there. The Deep State wasn't particularly interested in Ukraine in 2010, 2011, 2012. Suddenly in 2014 it was priority one for Cookies Nuland, Kinzinger and the rest of 'em. Draw your own conclusions.
Truth is so yesterday.
You provide zero proof for your assertions. I can provide lots of proof why "Russophobia" exists... BTW, it's not a "fear" of Russians, it's disdain.
Vladimir Putin was installed as President because he promised not to double-cross Yeltsin and have him prosecuted for corruption.
In order to win favour with the blood-thirsty Russians, he blew up three apartment buildings in Russia as a false-flag operation to harness anger to reignite the Second Chechen War.
Georgia and Ukraine wanted to join NATO but were rebuffed... so not to "offend" Vladimir Putin. Months later, Russian troops invaded Georgia.
In 2014, Putin's stooge, Yanukovych, who was installed after a fraudulent election, flew the coop back to Moscow. Enraged, Putin fomented trouble in the Donbas and Crimea. Putin's "Little Green Men" (AKA Russian Spetznaz) invaded Crimea. Putin then staged a phony "Referendum"... A la Sudetenland... Just like the Fuhrer did in 1938.
Notice how Russia talks a tough game against Poland and the Baltic countries yet dares not set one foot there because he knows Article 5 would be invoked.
So, your "Russophobia" analysis is bullshit. Funny how those closest to Russia are the most "Russophobic". They have a long memory of Russia's territorial designs and imperial aspirations.
lol don't embarrass yourself with your bullshit comment full of false claims...
ChatGPT: please write me an essay that parrots the talking points of the neo-con mainstream media in regards to the sentiments that westerners must have toward Russia in order to justify WW3.