67 Comments
Nov 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

A 'srategic pivot' to the Black Sea for NATO, something they hadn't previously considered??? Just where does that leave Turkey, the Bosporus and the Montreax Convention, exactly? If they could not do it before, how is that meant to happen now, at a time when Turkey is seeking to lead the Islamic world in opposing US support for Israel (and US bases in Syria and Iraq)? Either he is delusional or they have something very significant planned for Turkey.

Expand full comment

Oliver Stone’s two documentaries on Ukraine:

Ukraine On Fire

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ce4U5yMTNFc

Revealing Ukraine

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xMHrbUoSBso

Expand full comment
Nov 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

Let me congratulate you for being able to sit thru the presentation without vomiting. I'm so sick of the constant lying I can no longer attempt to even consider trying to rationally ascertain the truth. I now live in a black and white world. I have my sources on this war (Duran, Ritter, McGregor, Moon of Alabama, Larry Johnson & a few others) and I've determined they are telling the truth, rest parroting lies.

Regarding relations with Russia never going back where they were, I sincerely believe that is their thinking. What they have done to Europe they will do to us. In order to make their point, we will freeze in the winter and not be able to drive our cars.

All so they can retain power. F'd up world right now, devil running crazy.

Expand full comment
Nov 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

No one is more spot on about the Ukraine than Scott Ritter: youtube.com/watch?v=l6y3l9xLBRs

Expand full comment
Nov 22, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

Hope you don't mind Alex but I left this comment on Simplicius's last article. The article covered the mea culpas unfolding in the Western Media about the inevitable Russian victory. You're a brilliant dude wondering what your thought might be in the cards sir........

More damning proof to support our theory. I think most of us share the idea that NATO/US thought this was going to be a slam dunk. I have zero doubt that their arrogance led us here. Once Russia was a carcass being picked apart by scavengers the message would be loud and clear to China. Bend the knee or we will turn you into that.

So now what? I assume they had multiple scenarios and after studying these clowns for a several years I am dubious that they even bothered to war game a stronger more unified Russia. Not only within Russia, but stronger with her allies as well. Well here we are.

At the same time certain paradigms are crashing in the US. It’s no longer racist to ask how in hell did we get all these dual citizens into high levels of government leadership positions. Ideally the next candidate I truly support will NOT be afraid to ask this question. That person still has not stepped forward.

It’s pretty clear to me the significantly weaker version of Russia, China, Iran, etc was part of the global/2030 agenda. It would be ideal for when the time came for the bankers to reset the economy. However that doesn’t work so well when you have alternative systems.

The 2030 GA is moving full speed ahead on the domestic front as the US and Europe import migrants at breakneck speed. What’s going to happen if this service economy breaks down for real? I’ll tell you what, all hell is going to break loose, that’s what.

Alex would love to hear you pontificate on this matter and where you think we might be heading based on the latest developments. It seems to me a major part of their plan(s) has been demolished. Can the Globalist powers successfully cut a deal with the Global South power structure? They obviously have leverage with all of their nukes. I am wondering if they don't emulate what the former Soviet Block tried to do. Throw an iron curtain around everything and try to partition the world?

Expand full comment

“After the war there will be trials in which the truth about Nord Stream will emerge undeniable through legal discovery and the payback will be painful.”

It’s surreal to see people get up on a world stage in a posh place and tell such lies and fantasy. And these are just the influential frontmen for whatever evil animates them from behind. When you think of the scope of the fraud of a cooked up war, that a pretty massive thing to pull off. And they’ve been doing it for a long time.

With that in mind, where do you get the idea that there will ever be justice (trials as you say), because there never has been. Ever. Not even the charade after WW2.

But I have seen snippets here and there trying to reintroduce Q. What a joke. Maybe the elites are correct; people are just steaks on a plate (W. Cooper).

Expand full comment
founding
Nov 21, 2023·edited Nov 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

Great line" The difference, according to him is that authoritarian regimes treat people as subjects while democracies treat them as citizens". Love to know (besides the ability to "vote" (sic) ) his definition of citizenship. Every western country took our citizenship away, some more than others during "the Special Period" where all human and constitutional rights were "suspended" (sic). No one was a citizen then.

And it continues now with censorship (CIC sister to MIC) increasing and people being arrested for speech deemed against the narrative (go Elon!) nothing has returned to any standard of Citizenship I grew up with-- arguably not as free even then. So glad you went to hear him, I would have had to walk out. I don't live in Monaco sadly. 🥰

Expand full comment
Nov 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

My sole question about this entire shitshow is: how many of our dear leaders really believe these talking points? And would a believer reconcile the actual governance of Ukraine with any possible definition of democracy? Do you just put your head down and collect your paycheck, secure in the knowledge that America will somehow pull off a win? It boggles the mind.

Expand full comment
Nov 22, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

On a change of subject, have you come across the book "The Great Taking" by David Rogers Webb? He spells out how the "plumbing" of the securities settlement system (CSDs, ICSDs, CCPs) has first call on the collateral of stock portfolios and pension funds, pretty much all over the world. He demonstrates that the legal framework is already in place (and legally tested in the courts) and theorizes that this is by design, to ultimately implement a (very deflationary) "great taking". Having read that book, I have also begun to suspect that the acceleration in sovereign debt may also be part of such a process (ie no need to think twice in sending $100 bn to UKR if the intention is to default).

Expand full comment
Nov 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

As soon as I read the title of the article, I immediately answered the (rhetorical?) question with "NOTHING!" in my mind... boy, I was right! :)

To be honest, I would have been surprised if they had learnt "something", since they would have acted in a different way by now otherwise, but no... they just keep doing the same mistakes and believing the same propaganda they manufacture and try to feed us. GOSH! What can I say?

Expand full comment
Nov 21, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

I like that image of Dr. Evil. So appropriate actually. I really liked Seymour Hersh's article on Substack (subscribed). Incredibly researched by Hersh but of course ignored by mainstream. I certainly hope there's a Reckoning for all of this murderous non-sense.

Expand full comment

I'm now, "finally-in". Alex. Greetings ;)

Expand full comment
Jan 1Liked by Alex Krainer

Hi Alex.

Happy New Year. I wrote this to The Duran, about this topic, so I just copy, once again:

The Duran 31.12.2023 https://theduran.com/biden-scorched-earth-policy-prepares-to-steal-300b-russian-assets/

They, G7, will meet in late february 2024: https://www.reuters.com/world/us-proposes-g7-explore-ways-confiscate-300-bln-russian-assets-ft-2023-12-28/ , the Russian election is 15-17 March 2024: The Russian presidential election: The who, what and when | Reuters . In this interview former CIA analyst Ray McGovern suggests a NATO tactical nuke false flag event in Ukraine, "to turn things around": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAEl4P1LpCY (about 10.12 and 32.25 in) . Maybe he is right? I have been thinking the same. In the beginning of the SMO, commentators and officials in the West talked quite a lot about exactly that, that a desperate Putin would use a tactical nuke in Ukraine, and that USA would then most likely join the fight. That could be for "framing" the weatern publics for such an event, in advance, to now, few days before the russian precidental elections, to craate as mush problems and havoc for Putin and his party in a short time frame. That would be consisting with all the other western "war lies" we have had for a century: Episode 343 - Debunking A Century of War Lies - The Corbett Report ,

https://humansbefree.com/2014/10/these-13-families-rule-the-world-the-shadow-forces-behind-the-nwo.html , https://humansbefree.com/2015/05/queen-elizabeth-ii-is-direct-lineage-of-the-roman-caesars-by-blood-proven-fact.html , https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2017/01/3-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city/ , https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-A3_v4SEVxCudIit2/2014%20the_crown_temple_djvu.txt ,"ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS!") (whatreallyhappened.com) , WW3 - Albert Pike and the Three World Wars . It seems, as if The West, is a financial dictatorship and terror organization, hidden, more than some democracies, just working togeher, and that it has been so, since colonial days. Now it has shifted to financial colonialism, and the two world wars (most likely/ surely) planned, have consolidated this trend further. Now The West is going after Russia, and then China, if they succed, and for sure India also, at some point. Rulers/elites of the West, will not have strong, large opponents anywhere on the planet, it seems. Preparation for WW3 started with the beginning of the Cold War, just after the end of WW2, as preparations for WW2 started in the end of WW1, with the Russian revolution(installing the communists in Russia) and later Versailles. These people plan long term ahead. Maybe "they" did not underestimate Russia so much anyway. This was their original plan? Just to prolong the war to this moment, and then to get rid of Putin with a tactical nuke false flag event in Ukraine just before the Russia election? Install the western shadow governement, that I know exists, under international pressure, and get control over Russia again, that they lost with Putin?.

Just some thoughts? Maybe wrong, maybe not? Happy New Year from little Denmark no matter what.

------------------------------------------

I of cause do not know, if The West's elites dare to do this, if they think, that they can convince the world in believeing them, if they do it, in the light of Gaza and Ukraine's terror on civilian russians and east ukrainians, but with these people, you never know? As I see it. We will see. Best regards Tom.

Expand full comment
Nov 22, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

re Northstream who dunnit:

https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/dr-hans-benjamin-braun-on-the-dirk-pohlmann-show-1-july-2023/

Swiss physicist Dr Braun with a long list of highly quoted publications and additional degrees in mathematics and geology has published 7 sets of measurement data (e.g. seismological, water temperature, isotopes in the air) he obtained from public sources can only be interpreted as proof of the use of an underwater thermonuclear device of 1-3 kilotons yield.

Expand full comment
Nov 22, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

We've spent large sums of borrowed money while weaponizing our currency. And we've depleted of our defense reserves that the price gouging over mergered defense industry is struggling to replace. And we've ended the petrodollar / dollar's dominance to learn that Russia is probably far more resilient than we are. The usual idiots that got us into the mess have learned nothing.

Expand full comment
Nov 22, 2023·edited Nov 22, 2023Liked by Alex Krainer

George Robertson. Not Robinson.

And he became head of NATO. Not a small detail.

Basic inaccuracies harm credibility of argument.

Expand full comment