i hate no "peoples" as a group. but i notice a lot of boosterism of these two countries as some kind of alternative to our system, and we are ALL run by capitalism, bankers, and the Ownership class and they all want a technological turnkey totalitarian system of neofeudalism. and every month, Russia and China rush headlong into this glor…
i hate no "peoples" as a group. but i notice a lot of boosterism of these two countries as some kind of alternative to our system, and we are ALL run by capitalism, bankers, and the Ownership class and they all want a technological turnkey totalitarian system of neofeudalism. and every month, Russia and China rush headlong into this glorious future, whereas our idiot PR class tries to sell us on its advantages while simultaneously stoking antipathy towards it, them, and Russia and China. i don't care about that propaganda. i care about the fact that those countries are not glorious bastions of human flourishing. China is not even truly socialist, and yet lefties everywhere are constantly barraging us with its superiority over the "american" system. they HAVE the american system---of the gilded age.
The “boosterism” may simply be that they’re throwing sand into the gears of the globalist agenda. Those who fear hegemony are wise to welcome multipolarity.
local elites will still sell natural resources, get rich, and oppress the plebs in essentially precarious sweatshops for the benefit of the same group of people under a different sounding banner. Bankers everywhere will still be in charge, with politicians as their distractionary frontment. more frontmen of different colors and ethnicities is not any kind of political-economistic advance.
i see no "meat" to this word that boosters keep spewing, nor any difference in plans between these "multipolars" and the globalists.
the only difference (distinction without serious difference) is that the U.S. will not be the assigned "head" and perhaps not the muscle anymore. the muscle will be disguised behind slogans about how superior China is and how everyone should follow "Xi Jinping thought".
i hate no "peoples" as a group. but i notice a lot of boosterism of these two countries as some kind of alternative to our system, and we are ALL run by capitalism, bankers, and the Ownership class and they all want a technological turnkey totalitarian system of neofeudalism. and every month, Russia and China rush headlong into this glorious future, whereas our idiot PR class tries to sell us on its advantages while simultaneously stoking antipathy towards it, them, and Russia and China. i don't care about that propaganda. i care about the fact that those countries are not glorious bastions of human flourishing. China is not even truly socialist, and yet lefties everywhere are constantly barraging us with its superiority over the "american" system. they HAVE the american system---of the gilded age.
The “boosterism” may simply be that they’re throwing sand into the gears of the globalist agenda. Those who fear hegemony are wise to welcome multipolarity.
Multipolarity is a slogan, not a program.
local elites will still sell natural resources, get rich, and oppress the plebs in essentially precarious sweatshops for the benefit of the same group of people under a different sounding banner. Bankers everywhere will still be in charge, with politicians as their distractionary frontment. more frontmen of different colors and ethnicities is not any kind of political-economistic advance.
i see no "meat" to this word that boosters keep spewing, nor any difference in plans between these "multipolars" and the globalists.
the only difference (distinction without serious difference) is that the U.S. will not be the assigned "head" and perhaps not the muscle anymore. the muscle will be disguised behind slogans about how superior China is and how everyone should follow "Xi Jinping thought".