I do agree with everything you're saying. And I'd also like to point out that actually the US have also visibly taken some steps to walk back from increased conflict or nuclear risk in Ukraine. When the Brits proposed Ben Wallace, a well-recognised pro-war individual, for NATO Gen Sec, it was the Biden admin that chopped him.
I do agree with everything you're saying. And I'd also like to point out that actually the US have also visibly taken some steps to walk back from increased conflict or nuclear risk in Ukraine. When the Brits proposed Ben Wallace, a well-recognised pro-war individual, for NATO Gen Sec, it was the Biden admin that chopped him.
I agree Devaraj, good point. However, the worry is that seeding the war theater with so many US/NATO military assets is a minefield of possible false flag mishaps. If there's a mass casualty event against US or other NATO troops, the chain reaction could be irreversible.
It certainly is a very volatile and worrying situation right now. Here in Turkiye, Erdogan was absolutely pounding the EU yesterday for not standing behind the convention on human rights. Many Muslims are getting more and more enraged by the Israelis and the Western govs not demanding a ceasefire.
The US now has moved 4 aircraft carriers & numerous warships into the region, as well as supplying more arms to Israel. Repubs are talking about $1B in aid.
As per video, last week they vetoed the ceasefire proposal because it didn't specifically condemn Hamas.
I absolutely agree that the situation is worrying to say the least. I'm also pointing out that, if the US had WW3 or nuclear engagement on the agenda, then that could easily have been achieved in Ukraine earlier this year. Yet, they actually chopped the Brit attempt to bring it on.
To me, that's more about strategy rather than about trying to start WW3 or go nuke.
I actually don't agree about Russia-Ukraine, TBH. Ukraine is the central "heartland" of Eurasia that geopol types got taught about in their military academies. Controlling central Eurasia, or the "rimland" surrounding, is a big deal for these guys.
I'm not saying we're trying to create a nuke Holocaust or hot WW3.
Or that Ukr is not a big deal. I'm saying Ukr is 1. A longer term plan, for future resource theft & 2. It's not the only deal in trying to weaken Russia. Eg Chechnya, Serbia, Azerbaijan, Niger.
And I am saying Israel is our main outpost in tbe ME, our *current* supply. Cut off Syria, & were in trouble. Block the strait of Hormuz & our goose is cooked, so to speak.
The real danger, though, is that it is *personal.*
Biden & Netanyahu both face criminal corruption charges that will destroy them. And Biden's handlers & followers are arguably rabidly, pathologically filled with hate.
And the very small seas are getting increasingly crowded.
Fair enough. Yet the post was about invoking Armageddon. That was the topic.
Given that the US is actively blocking a UN call for ceasefire, whilst simultaneously bringing military assets into the area, does make it look like they will green light a Gaza invasion once they have assets in place to back the Israelis up. That's what I figure.
The US' main forward bases in the region are actually in Muslim Brotherhood-supporting countries (Turkiye and Qatar). Israel may be the focus, but it is not where the US assets are.
I do agree with everything you're saying. And I'd also like to point out that actually the US have also visibly taken some steps to walk back from increased conflict or nuclear risk in Ukraine. When the Brits proposed Ben Wallace, a well-recognised pro-war individual, for NATO Gen Sec, it was the Biden admin that chopped him.
I agree Devaraj, good point. However, the worry is that seeding the war theater with so many US/NATO military assets is a minefield of possible false flag mishaps. If there's a mass casualty event against US or other NATO troops, the chain reaction could be irreversible.
It certainly is a very volatile and worrying situation right now. Here in Turkiye, Erdogan was absolutely pounding the EU yesterday for not standing behind the convention on human rights. Many Muslims are getting more and more enraged by the Israelis and the Western govs not demanding a ceasefire.
I think that might be part of the plan unfortunately.
The US now has moved 4 aircraft carriers & numerous warships into the region, as well as supplying more arms to Israel. Repubs are talking about $1B in aid.
As per video, last week they vetoed the ceasefire proposal because it didn't specifically condemn Hamas.
Talk is cheap. Actions say prepping for war.
I absolutely agree that the situation is worrying to say the least. I'm also pointing out that, if the US had WW3 or nuclear engagement on the agenda, then that could easily have been achieved in Ukraine earlier this year. Yet, they actually chopped the Brit attempt to bring it on.
The Biden administration does not want WWIII just yet. They want it to coordinate with the 2024 elections, so Puppet Biden can stay in office.
Strategically, Israel is far more important to the US than Ukraine. There is no comparison.
Russia is a longer term goal & can be "bled" (in their minds) from any # of places.
Not only is Israel their main forward base in the ME & lock on ME oil right now, look how many Zionists are in high positions in government & finance.
With Israel its personal. Ukraine, not so much.
To me, that's more about strategy rather than about trying to start WW3 or go nuke.
I actually don't agree about Russia-Ukraine, TBH. Ukraine is the central "heartland" of Eurasia that geopol types got taught about in their military academies. Controlling central Eurasia, or the "rimland" surrounding, is a big deal for these guys.
I'm not saying we're trying to create a nuke Holocaust or hot WW3.
Or that Ukr is not a big deal. I'm saying Ukr is 1. A longer term plan, for future resource theft & 2. It's not the only deal in trying to weaken Russia. Eg Chechnya, Serbia, Azerbaijan, Niger.
And I am saying Israel is our main outpost in tbe ME, our *current* supply. Cut off Syria, & were in trouble. Block the strait of Hormuz & our goose is cooked, so to speak.
The real danger, though, is that it is *personal.*
Biden & Netanyahu both face criminal corruption charges that will destroy them. And Biden's handlers & followers are arguably rabidly, pathologically filled with hate.
And the very small seas are getting increasingly crowded.
It's a recipe for disaster.
Fair enough. Yet the post was about invoking Armageddon. That was the topic.
Given that the US is actively blocking a UN call for ceasefire, whilst simultaneously bringing military assets into the area, does make it look like they will green light a Gaza invasion once they have assets in place to back the Israelis up. That's what I figure.
Armageddon can be invoked deliberately & consciously.
Or, by the delusional or self-unaware, unconsciously..
Hubris...
Atis....*We are here
Nemesis...
Tisis
The US' main forward bases in the region are actually in Muslim Brotherhood-supporting countries (Turkiye and Qatar). Israel may be the focus, but it is not where the US assets are.
Last I saw, both Turkiye & Qatar are leaning toward Brics & Russia.
(It may have been re:the cease fire votes. But it was something very clear in tbe last week or 2).