Reading through this I guess the big conundrum is India. It's a founding member of BRICS, and of course Iran is now also a member whose importance as a hub for the North-South and East-West corridors can't be overstated. IMO, the Empire's hostility to Iran is using the (non-existent) nuclear threat as cover for attacking a country they feel is the weakest of the major BRICS' players, but is aimed squarely at taking down or disrupting BRICS.
At some point India will have to get off the fence. I expect that the ties of convenience to Israel are largely based on 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' basis, but since neither China nor Russia will permit Iran to go down, then they also cannot permit Pakistan to be rolled over either, as Pakistan's support for Iran is a great counterbalance in a region where Azerbaijan and Turkey are now flexing their muscles.
Could the PTB provoke a nuclear confrontation? I guess we'll find out, but my expectation is that there is no low to which they will not go, even if that costs billions of lives.
I keep telling my wife that once you realize that we, the West, are the bad guys then everything else seems to fall into place. Shit situation for everyone, frankly.
The [world] sees that as so too ! when the example is demonstrated the cry will rise over all heads and Settle the settlers wherever they be.. unfortunate but ‘intelligent’ dialogue&discourse has no Ear !
"L'instauration d'un Nouvel Ordre Mondial ne peut se faire, bien évidemment, sans la Chine.
C'est la raison pour laquelle, le 24 et 25 mai 1981, une trentaine de membres de la Commission Trilatérale se réunissaient à Pékin à l'initiative de l'Institut chinois des affaires étrangères.
[...]
Etaient présents:
Henri François Simonet: ... Bilderberg ...
Peter Shore: ... Fabian Society ...
David Rockefeller: ... Trilatérale ... Bilderberg ... Pilgrims Society ...
Gerhard Schroeder . ... Bilderberg ...
José Antonio Segurado: ...
Tadashi Yamamoto: ... Trilatérale ...
Takeshi Watanabe: ... Trilatérale ...
Norbert Kloten: ... Bank ...
Yusuko kashwagi: ... Banque ... Trilatérale ...
Robert S. Ingersoll: ... Trilatérale ...
Winston Lord: ... Bilderberg ...
Bruce MacLaury: ... Federal Reserve Bank ... Bilderberg ... Trilatérale ...
Michel Oksenberg: ...
GlennE. Watts: ...
T. A. Wilson: ... président de la Compagnie Boeing ...
They won't sacrifice Israel as their ultimate plan is to destroy pax Americana and install Anti Christ as the supreme leader of pax Judaica in the holy Jerusalem on the throne of third temple to rule over the world. But these satanic group's (read ex Dutch banker Ronald Bernard's testimony) plan will fail as light always overcomes darkness, humanity is awakening with lots of help from the watchers in the book of Enoch aka Thiaooubans from the 9th planet in the book Thiaoouba Prophecy.
A very nice sentiment, but the "always" is not even close to being the reality, at least within the time frame of a single age of a species. Growth, decay and extinction is demonstrated by the various remains of previous species of man.
Nobility of spirit far closer to being an aberration than the norm in the world of the powerful.
From the image of mankind, any "watcher" might observe, the hierarchy of influence over humanity runs in a direction that is entirely opposite to a species that will rise to enlightenment
Domazet may not be a household name, but he’s one of those few voices whose predictions and insights hold up years down the line, which is a hell of a lot more than can be said for the pundit-industrial complex in the West.
What stands out most is how clearly he identifies the deeper structure behind these conflicts.
The India-Pakistan incident is a case in point. It was a litmus test of tech, alliances, and readiness. And on all three counts, the West came up short.
When $250 million jets get outclassed by aircraft that cost a fifth as much, you’re not just talking about procurement screwups, you’re seeing cracks in a whole system of strategic assumptions.
What makes this all the more serious is the West’s persistent misreading of the room. They still think escalation equals leverage, but that calculus falls apart when the other side has their own nukes, their own satellites, and now increasingly better gear.
It’s not 1991 anymore.
China and Russia aren’t standing by. Iran isn’t isolated. And Pakistan isn’t Iraq.
What most people in the West do not understand is that all evil has had its cradle in Great Britain, specifically in London City, for centuries. They start wars, revolutions, create and destroy states, plundering the whole world. And they consider it their right. They forcefully introduce "demoNcracy", the semblance of freedom of speech - until someone speaks out against them, the semblance of free trade - when it is in their favor, and protectionist when it is not. Where have the liberation movements disappeared in the world? All of them are declared terrorists, and terrorist formations created by the West become their partners overnight (Taliban, ISIL, Al Qaida, Jolani...). They force digital money so they can control and "delete" people from the system. Let's remember power outages and multi-day complete blockages of money transactions. By deliberately creating chaos, they want to provoke the armed phase of World War III, because it has been simmering for a long time. Admiral Domazet, Alex Kreiner and Stjepan Kulić, incredibly well-informed and thoughtful Croats respected throughout the world, open the doors to those who want to see. Unfortunately, in Croatia they are hindered in their public appearances in every possible way.
Yes, The Empire of the City. Three interlocking corporate city states that currently control the world economically, through City of London, militarily through the District of Columbia, and spiritually through Vatican City.
No, not "spiritually". The seat of the Roman Church is not about spirituality, it is about religion. There is a big difference! So, 'religiously' thru Vatican City.
bloody oath, mate, spirituality is virtually forgotten in the west. it has become a meaningless word. bandied around, used for profit by every charlatan you can think of.
In fact our whole language: english - has been perverted almost out of existence.
But there especially. However there is a chance for some revival. A big chance really.
Via the NDE thing. You know what that means: 'NDE" ? It means 'near death experience' and that means people who are pronounced dead but then come to life again and tell a story about what they think happened to them while they were dead.
So, of course, if something happened to them then they could not have been dead is the thinking so they are called 'near death' experiences. Rather than perhaps 'return from the dead'.
Even though a few minutes ago they were pronounced ready for the morgue and all the scientific instruments pointed to exactly that.
Some of the actually made it to the morgue even...
I am writing all this for those who don't know. Of course. Skip it, please, if you know.
So what's the deal? Well the deal is that they all 'come back' with different stories but yet they are all 'the same'.
For they all say there is one god and that god is love.
I'll say no more.
check it out for yourself. That is true 'spirituality' that is spoken of and experienced there.
I'll give you one link for a starter and then find your own way:
Hi Arthur. You asked if knew what NDE is, but then went on to tell me in great detail. That's a bit presumptuous, you know? Anyway, you are "preaching to the choir" with me. And I am in perfect agreement with you - the NDEs are as close to a true view of reality as we can get while still in this earthly body. It's anecdotal of course, but when you have thousands and thousands of folks reporting the same "anecdote" you really have to stop and think about this.
Great article! Only one minor observation on this sentence:
"In this sense, the war in Ukraine, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan are all related. They are related in another way: Western empire is also losing in all of them."
- Ukraine: yes, the West is losing.
- Gaza: difficult to say, as it is more of a genocide than a real war, but we can say that the West is struggling to beat Hamas.
- Lebanon: here I'd say that, for the time being, the West is winning. From what I see, Hezbollah has become a paper tiger, unless it is holding its cards near its chest, though I once speculated that Sheikh Naim Qassem could be a Western puppet, as he is all talk, no walk... plus I really find hard to believe how he survived the killing of the whole cadre of Hezbollah (was he the Mossad mole?)
- Syria: again, the West seems to be winning here, as it installed its own puppet in Damascus.
- Iran: the West has badly lost... as in Yemen.
- Afghanistan: the West badly lost.
- Pakistan: the West badly lost.
So, overall, the West is doing bad with just a couple of exceptions (Lebanon and Syria).
The western audience is not still aware of the stakes... They content themselves with the next cruiser trip vaccation. The fall is going to be so abyssal that generations will perish before someone find the way up.
Despite so many in the "western audience" professing to be 'Christians', they ignore many passages from the Old Testament, which Christ certainly knew and believed in. Such as this from Isaiah 40:4 - "every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level...".
When you consider catholicism its like fast judaism for the Roman masses, a unified monopolistic cult which spanned all aspects of social life, shaped the minds and punished the unwilling. It has little to do with Jesus or divinity. In fact, its a cult to multiple deities like Virgin Mary or saints in the form of icones, images, sculptures, with a primitive superstitious exchange with the God. If you give me this I will worship you. Concerning protestantism, its pure judaism. The lack of images or barroque rituals makes it more modern, more abstract and purer. But the worship of money (Webers The protestan ethics of capitslism) makes it antichristian, since Jesus put it clearly: Dont worship money. I am more and more convinced that islam is philosophically the more advanced of the current religions, since the deal with the God does not exist, only acceptance, it is tolerant with other religions, it is abstract, non ritualistic, its practical, based on prayer and provides a direct experience with the God and inmersively live within the God. I am a baptised catholic.
The bad tendency of religion in general and Christianity specifically is the gap between belief and practice. In a general sense, few actually imitate Jesus even though they go to church. One wonders if Jesus’s ecclesia in Matthew’s gospel was or really wasn’t “visible” institutionally but intended to be visible in the individual and collective.
Hi Alex, I found this analysis of yours very illuminating and I was not aware of much of the information specific to Pakistan and India other than that infamous Nutsy Yahoo quote. However one thing in it confuses me. You wrote:
"On 22 April, a terrorist attack took place in Pahalagam, in India's territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The attack was attributed to Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and its military. It left 25 Indian tourists and one Nepali individual dead. The attack provoked outrage in India and vows of retribution, which finally happened during the night of 6 May as India launched an air attack against Pakistan."
However you did not comment on who attributed the attack to ISI. For me, I would assume the attack was planned and sponsored as a joint FF venture between Mossad and MI6. They had the motivation to start this war and it showed their psychopathic disregard for any semblance which is conventionally referred to as human decency. They both regard this attitude tactically as a laudable feature and not a bug.
As commonly occurs though, their overweening pride was oblivious to the amazing superiority of the Chinese fighter jets over the NATO jets, and particularly their air-to-air missiles, resulting in the aggression literally blowing up in their faces. It is unfortunate that Rutte and Macron were not piloting two of the destroyed Indian jets.
When the "12 day war" resumes in September, and if the Zionists repeat their tactic of using F-35s to launch cruise missiles from outside of Iranian air space, it would be a total hoot if the Iranians were prepared to send these Chinese fighters outside of their airspace also and shoot down the Zionist F-35's. If I could be sure of this occurring, I would bet the farm (for what it is worth) on shorting Lockheed-Martin stock.
I would welcome your return comment on this specific.
Alex I am a fan of yours but I feel this analysis is completely wrong. Pakistan is a complete and total western puppet state. Since the 1970's the US has had good ties with the Pakistani junta and intelligence agency. So much so that the US deployed warships against India when Pakistan was badly losing the war in Bangladesh. When the Soviet's invaded Afghanistan the Pakistani government was a central linchpin in providing help to the terrorists and mujhadeen in Afghanistan. The military whom you quote as being opposed by Israel was being actively aided and funded by the CIA. This is a pretty mainstream opinion. However once he became a liability for them the CIA took him out. And installed a new military junta. Once the war was over the CIA kept it's contacts in the ISI and Pakistan continued to function as a US proxy to influence matters in Afghanistan. The nukes you talk about, their research was funded by Saudis. Who do you think the Saudis work for? The west. Just like Qatar the provide the money to terrorists and help the west keep their hands clean. Once the war on terror began in Afghanistan it was Pakistan which was the main logistical corridor for the Nato forces there. However because the Taliban was very weak and couldn't offer any real resistance to Nato the CIA decided to arm them with Pakistan's help. All the factories producing weapons and bombs for the Taliban were in Pakistan. This made Taliban more aggressive and consequently justified US occupation of the country. Last year when Raisi was the President of Iran Pakistan literally did missile strikes on Iran which the tried to play of as a mistake. But Iran clearly didn't consider it as such because the retaliated back with strikes of their own. It is a well known fact that the military junta runs Pakistan. This power was being challenged by Imran Khan who was trying to assert some independent power of his own as a PM. One of this was visiting russia on the day of the invasion in ukraine(SMO). However the US state department collaborated with the current Pakistani government to overthrow him for this crime. There was extensive research done on this by Dropsite news. The current Pakistani government was literally put in place by the US. Later Imran khan was persecuted and put in prison after a failed assassination attempt. Early last year Pakistan had elections which were clearly rigged by the military. Millions of Pakistanis came out on streets in protest against it. Pakistan's current financial condition is extremely brittle. They can't qualify for loans from even Saudi and China inspire of their interests in Pakistan. That's why the Pakistani government is surviving on loans from the IMF which approved them inspite of virtual certainty of never being repaid. Who controls the IMF? Again the west does. What do you think they demanded in return? While all this was happening Pakistan was facing massive terrorist attacks from the Pakistani Taliban and Balochi separatists. You say that India arms the Balochis however most weapons the balochis have turn out to be american leftovers from the afghan war. What is more plausible; that India smuggles weapons across one of the world's most militarised borders or that the weapons come from the wild west that is Afghanistan. And guess who gets to justify continued massive military spending when the country goes to shit? That's right the Pakistani junta who pocket most of that money and store it in their swiss accounts and french mansions. How many iranian government officials do you think have property in the west? Also lest we forget the US has multiple military bases in Pakistan. One would think that if the Pakistani government truly opposed the west they might give a thought to expelling western troops in their own country. Also any sane government would not risk war as its on the verge of bankruptcy unless ofcourse that in itself is a condition for being eligible for the next loan. If you remember last there was a regime change op in Bangladesh where a western friendly puppet regime was established. Simultaneously there was regime change in Pakistan. In this way the west can punish India for being in the BRICS by putting pressure on both flanks. How is this any different than color revolutions in Ukraine and Georgia. Coming back to more recent times The Pakistani government beat its chest about how they supported Iran and the very next day Donald Trump had a lunch with the Pakistani chief of staff. Do you think that a country which really threatened the US & Israel with nukes would get dinner invites to the white house? Pakistan's role is very obvious here it is to be the Trojan horse for Iran. If Iran trusts them and Turkey it is setting itself up for betrayal. The israeli media talking about attacking Pakistan is just a pure ploy give credibility to the Pakistani government's efforts to make friends with Iran. It os just as fake as their talk about going to war with Turkey. If they truly opposed either of these regimes which cooperate fully with the west they would attempt to regime change them like they are trying in iran. Instead they make dubious claims and talk about war. Both Turkey and Pakistan have american bases. Until they expel them there no reason even to begin trusting them. The economic and political situation in pakistan is quite bad so this short conflict could also help in bolstered public support for the junta. As for the Indian planes being shot down there is evidence for only two of them. Also the Indian planes were striking terrorist sites as a retaliation. This claim is not challenged by Pakistan as far as I know. So the Indians expected Pakistan to not object to this in order to prevent escalation. This process is not unprecedented as it had happened before in 2019. Both sides could have gotten out without losing face. However Pakistan chose to attack the planes whereas the Indian planes were not allowed to shoot back. If there was a war as Pakistan wanted which country do you think would last long? The normal one or the one on the verge of bankruptcy? The west is putting pressure on India just as they do with russia or china. They wouldn't bother to do so if they thought India wasn't serious about brics eg. Egypt. I am extremely disheartened when I say the Iranians associating with Turkey,Pakistan and Azerbaijan instead of russia or china or india. I feel like Pezeshkian truly is a fifth columnist traitor like pashinyan is in Armenia. I was very disappointed when iran agreed to a ceasefire with israel. What could iran get from that except betrayal. Anyways I hope you and the admiral do better research next time and don't just trust the media narrative while reaching a conclusion.
Andy, 100% correct on all points. Alex has commented on an area and a subject that he knows nothing about, as is clear from his evidence-free repetition of Pakistan's creative lies and total ignorance of Pakistan's role as major western (US) ally in the region.
"The West has become a totalitarian space – the space of a self-defensive hegemony defending itself against its own weakness." (Jean Baudrillard)
The system today survives only through the successful marketing of emergencies: pandemics, military conflicts, trade wars, and other disasters waiting in line. Chaos and destabilisation are deliberately weaponised in order to trigger a series of Pavlovian chain reactions whose actual 'raison d’être' is emphatically financial.
The most ludicrous part of the story is that the super-indebted and super-unproductive superpower now needs the aid of inflation to keep its dirty underbelly covered. However tedious the debt maths may seem to most of us, it alone confirms that today’s system is bankrupt – a predicament significantly exacerbated by the ubiquitous phenomenon of “collapse denialism”, which edges the system closer to the nuclear “solution”.
Your posts on the Ukraine / Russia conflict and the US fiscal situation are usually interesting, logical and backed up by evidence. However this post surprisingly fails on all counts. Let me go down the list of errors and lack of evidence I find through the post.
1. Domazet may be an authoritative source for Ukraine / Russia / Serbia / NATO matters but he is clearly out of his depth when commenting on India, Pakistan, China. India's deal for the Rafales includes technology transfer, including software, and eventual manufacture in India. Pakistan is getting the Chinese hardware and support almost free as quid pro quo for Pakistan supporting China in the BRI and other international matters.
2. India has its own satellites and its own GPS which is a match for the best in the world. Indian defence staff are well aware of China's operational support for Pakistan and it would be foolish to assume they did not plan for it.
3. All six Indian jets were shot down??? Evidence? none. Pakistan has not produced a single piece of evidence of downed jets on their side of the border. FYI, India is a boisterous open society where even a single bomb falling down anywhere would be on social media instantly. There is no way that 6 downed jets could be kept secret. Sorry Alex, you have swallowed Pak disinformation hook, line and sinker.
4. You 'forgot' to mention India's BrahMOS missile, based on Russian technology modified and manufactured in India. It is a hypersonic missile and hits by this missile disabled all of Pakistan's major airfields on the first day itself.
5. India's BrahMOS missiles also hit the Noor Khan airbase, known to be a storage site for Pak's nuclear bombs. The missile effectively collapsed part of the hill and blocked the entrance to the nuclear storage site. A US top secret plane carrying tech to counter radiation and nuclear fallout was urgently sent to Noor Khan airbase the next day. If India wanted, they could have continued the attack and destroyed Pak's ability to fight a war. It was Pakistan that urgently asked for a cease-fire, backed up by Trump. We don't know exactly why India ceased operations, but it is certainly not due to any loss of ability to continue. There is a lot of evidence of this from Indian sources which obviously you didn't look for.
6. Geo-strategic conclusions: You say the west is trying to contain Pakistan - utterly wrong. Pakistan is already in the western sphere, while at the same time walking a fine line with China. Pakistan is surviving hand-to-mouth solely on money from the US and the IMF. China is helping Pakistan in areas of interest to itself - BRI and to keep India busy on the western front. In fact, there is talk that the Pak nuclear capability is not home-grown but rather US nuclear bombs kept in Pakistan, potentially for use against China & India.
You conclude that the seat of power will eventually move from the West to the East but fail to notice that the East also includes India.
This Croatian admiral has a gift for clarity. I read his article on the implications of hypersonic technology, but the great powers continue to play the same old game. They don't seem to understand, they don't seem to want to realize. I don't think they're stupid, and I have only two explanations: either they're truly desperate, or they're a demonic cult bent on destroying humanity.
One point that needs to be continually pushed into mainstream awareness is the fact the West is clearly under the influence of the most extreme criminal element on the face of the Planet. The Banking connections to the Drug Cartels, the genocidal Zionist terror regime of Israel, the Pharmaceutical Industry both medical and agricultural, the Arms industry, and the UN, all go to demonstrate these creatures that are less than human and have no legitimate place in the governance of humanity.
Their names, their face, their residence's, their places of business, and their crimes, need to be constantly made public knowledge.
Military technology notwithstanding, I can't imagine how the West could win any confrontation with the East, considering the general state of mind of the occidental populations. Westerners live in an illusion of general superiority over the rest of the world, immersed in various inane or decadent activities, unable to fight their way out of a paper bag. The vast majority of people have zero motivation to go to war, despite the fearmongering about the Russian threat. The part of the population who might be responsive to the propaganda generally subscribe to the trans-blah-blah-blah ideology and are effeminate weaklings who wouldn't last a second on the battlefield, and those who don't, and stay in good shape, generally see through the bullshit and wouldn't be caught dead fighting for the globalist elites.
Does anybody remember the (44) day war in Nagorno-Karabakh, where Azerbaijan attacked Armenia's province? Well, sorry to burst your bubble, but Pakistan was on the same team as Israel, Turkey, and Azerbaijan, along with Ukraine to topple the 2nd Republic known as Artsakh.
If you think that the informed believe that Pakistan is on the side of Al-Qaeda, that is not entirely wrong, as the entire Collective West is on the side of Al-Qaeda, establishing a Sharia Law state and pressuring Syrian minorities to accept Islam, while US and EU NGO's offer new VISAs to expatriating Syrian Christians.
Showing Pakistan is rooting for Iran, like it showed in the (12) day battle with Israel, is like Turkey screaming about the rights of Palestinians, while it has a 40% export of Azerbaijani oil being delivered like clockwork to the ports of its "adversary."
Reading through this I guess the big conundrum is India. It's a founding member of BRICS, and of course Iran is now also a member whose importance as a hub for the North-South and East-West corridors can't be overstated. IMO, the Empire's hostility to Iran is using the (non-existent) nuclear threat as cover for attacking a country they feel is the weakest of the major BRICS' players, but is aimed squarely at taking down or disrupting BRICS.
At some point India will have to get off the fence. I expect that the ties of convenience to Israel are largely based on 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' basis, but since neither China nor Russia will permit Iran to go down, then they also cannot permit Pakistan to be rolled over either, as Pakistan's support for Iran is a great counterbalance in a region where Azerbaijan and Turkey are now flexing their muscles.
Could the PTB provoke a nuclear confrontation? I guess we'll find out, but my expectation is that there is no low to which they will not go, even if that costs billions of lives.
I keep telling my wife that once you realize that we, the West, are the bad guys then everything else seems to fall into place. Shit situation for everyone, frankly.
The [world] sees that as so too ! when the example is demonstrated the cry will rise over all heads and Settle the settlers wherever they be.. unfortunate but ‘intelligent’ dialogue&discourse has no Ear !
They all sit at the same table.
"Archives du mondialisme",
by Pierre Hillard
Annexe XXVIII - p.761-770 (original version):
"L'instauration d'un Nouvel Ordre Mondial ne peut se faire, bien évidemment, sans la Chine.
C'est la raison pour laquelle, le 24 et 25 mai 1981, une trentaine de membres de la Commission Trilatérale se réunissaient à Pékin à l'initiative de l'Institut chinois des affaires étrangères.
[...]
Etaient présents:
Henri François Simonet: ... Bilderberg ...
Peter Shore: ... Fabian Society ...
David Rockefeller: ... Trilatérale ... Bilderberg ... Pilgrims Society ...
Gerhard Schroeder . ... Bilderberg ...
José Antonio Segurado: ...
Tadashi Yamamoto: ... Trilatérale ...
Takeshi Watanabe: ... Trilatérale ...
Norbert Kloten: ... Bank ...
Yusuko kashwagi: ... Banque ... Trilatérale ...
Robert S. Ingersoll: ... Trilatérale ...
Winston Lord: ... Bilderberg ...
Bruce MacLaury: ... Federal Reserve Bank ... Bilderberg ... Trilatérale ...
Michel Oksenberg: ...
GlennE. Watts: ...
T. A. Wilson: ... président de la Compagnie Boeing ...
..."
They won't sacrifice Israel as their ultimate plan is to destroy pax Americana and install Anti Christ as the supreme leader of pax Judaica in the holy Jerusalem on the throne of third temple to rule over the world. But these satanic group's (read ex Dutch banker Ronald Bernard's testimony) plan will fail as light always overcomes darkness, humanity is awakening with lots of help from the watchers in the book of Enoch aka Thiaooubans from the 9th planet in the book Thiaoouba Prophecy.
A very nice sentiment, but the "always" is not even close to being the reality, at least within the time frame of a single age of a species. Growth, decay and extinction is demonstrated by the various remains of previous species of man.
Nobility of spirit far closer to being an aberration than the norm in the world of the powerful.
From the image of mankind, any "watcher" might observe, the hierarchy of influence over humanity runs in a direction that is entirely opposite to a species that will rise to enlightenment
Domazet may not be a household name, but he’s one of those few voices whose predictions and insights hold up years down the line, which is a hell of a lot more than can be said for the pundit-industrial complex in the West.
What stands out most is how clearly he identifies the deeper structure behind these conflicts.
The India-Pakistan incident is a case in point. It was a litmus test of tech, alliances, and readiness. And on all three counts, the West came up short.
When $250 million jets get outclassed by aircraft that cost a fifth as much, you’re not just talking about procurement screwups, you’re seeing cracks in a whole system of strategic assumptions.
What makes this all the more serious is the West’s persistent misreading of the room. They still think escalation equals leverage, but that calculus falls apart when the other side has their own nukes, their own satellites, and now increasingly better gear.
It’s not 1991 anymore.
China and Russia aren’t standing by. Iran isn’t isolated. And Pakistan isn’t Iraq.
What most people in the West do not understand is that all evil has had its cradle in Great Britain, specifically in London City, for centuries. They start wars, revolutions, create and destroy states, plundering the whole world. And they consider it their right. They forcefully introduce "demoNcracy", the semblance of freedom of speech - until someone speaks out against them, the semblance of free trade - when it is in their favor, and protectionist when it is not. Where have the liberation movements disappeared in the world? All of them are declared terrorists, and terrorist formations created by the West become their partners overnight (Taliban, ISIL, Al Qaida, Jolani...). They force digital money so they can control and "delete" people from the system. Let's remember power outages and multi-day complete blockages of money transactions. By deliberately creating chaos, they want to provoke the armed phase of World War III, because it has been simmering for a long time. Admiral Domazet, Alex Kreiner and Stjepan Kulić, incredibly well-informed and thoughtful Croats respected throughout the world, open the doors to those who want to see. Unfortunately, in Croatia they are hindered in their public appearances in every possible way.
Yes, The Empire of the City. Three interlocking corporate city states that currently control the world economically, through City of London, militarily through the District of Columbia, and spiritually through Vatican City.
No, not "spiritually". The seat of the Roman Church is not about spirituality, it is about religion. There is a big difference! So, 'religiously' thru Vatican City.
bloody oath, mate, spirituality is virtually forgotten in the west. it has become a meaningless word. bandied around, used for profit by every charlatan you can think of.
In fact our whole language: english - has been perverted almost out of existence.
But there especially. However there is a chance for some revival. A big chance really.
Via the NDE thing. You know what that means: 'NDE" ? It means 'near death experience' and that means people who are pronounced dead but then come to life again and tell a story about what they think happened to them while they were dead.
So, of course, if something happened to them then they could not have been dead is the thinking so they are called 'near death' experiences. Rather than perhaps 'return from the dead'.
Even though a few minutes ago they were pronounced ready for the morgue and all the scientific instruments pointed to exactly that.
Some of the actually made it to the morgue even...
I am writing all this for those who don't know. Of course. Skip it, please, if you know.
So what's the deal? Well the deal is that they all 'come back' with different stories but yet they are all 'the same'.
For they all say there is one god and that god is love.
I'll say no more.
check it out for yourself. That is true 'spirituality' that is spoken of and experienced there.
I'll give you one link for a starter and then find your own way:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBkYrfrJVnY
Hi Arthur. You asked if knew what NDE is, but then went on to tell me in great detail. That's a bit presumptuous, you know? Anyway, you are "preaching to the choir" with me. And I am in perfect agreement with you - the NDEs are as close to a true view of reality as we can get while still in this earthly body. It's anecdotal of course, but when you have thousands and thousands of folks reporting the same "anecdote" you really have to stop and think about this.
I'll say what you won't, Arthur: they ALL without exception, mention Jesus Christ! For those who doubt, please have a watch - 8 mins:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aNMX4cooI4&ab_channel=ShawnRyanClips
Who are "they" and "all"? I've read and heard many NDEs without any Jesus at all. So don't go running away with this claim. Do more diligent work!
Excellent comment!
Great article! Only one minor observation on this sentence:
"In this sense, the war in Ukraine, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan are all related. They are related in another way: Western empire is also losing in all of them."
- Ukraine: yes, the West is losing.
- Gaza: difficult to say, as it is more of a genocide than a real war, but we can say that the West is struggling to beat Hamas.
- Lebanon: here I'd say that, for the time being, the West is winning. From what I see, Hezbollah has become a paper tiger, unless it is holding its cards near its chest, though I once speculated that Sheikh Naim Qassem could be a Western puppet, as he is all talk, no walk... plus I really find hard to believe how he survived the killing of the whole cadre of Hezbollah (was he the Mossad mole?)
- Syria: again, the West seems to be winning here, as it installed its own puppet in Damascus.
- Iran: the West has badly lost... as in Yemen.
- Afghanistan: the West badly lost.
- Pakistan: the West badly lost.
So, overall, the West is doing bad with just a couple of exceptions (Lebanon and Syria).
Has there been a war the West's neocons promote and engage in, from Viet Nam forward, that actually has been won?
The western audience is not still aware of the stakes... They content themselves with the next cruiser trip vaccation. The fall is going to be so abyssal that generations will perish before someone find the way up.
Despite so many in the "western audience" professing to be 'Christians', they ignore many passages from the Old Testament, which Christ certainly knew and believed in. Such as this from Isaiah 40:4 - "every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level...".
When you consider catholicism its like fast judaism for the Roman masses, a unified monopolistic cult which spanned all aspects of social life, shaped the minds and punished the unwilling. It has little to do with Jesus or divinity. In fact, its a cult to multiple deities like Virgin Mary or saints in the form of icones, images, sculptures, with a primitive superstitious exchange with the God. If you give me this I will worship you. Concerning protestantism, its pure judaism. The lack of images or barroque rituals makes it more modern, more abstract and purer. But the worship of money (Webers The protestan ethics of capitslism) makes it antichristian, since Jesus put it clearly: Dont worship money. I am more and more convinced that islam is philosophically the more advanced of the current religions, since the deal with the God does not exist, only acceptance, it is tolerant with other religions, it is abstract, non ritualistic, its practical, based on prayer and provides a direct experience with the God and inmersively live within the God. I am a baptised catholic.
Try Orthodoxy ;)
Islam is not tolerant of other religions in their practice, only in their precepts. They SAY they are tolerant. They don't do that though.
I've spent hours and hours studying all of the religions of the World. I still do not call myself any one of them.
The bad tendency of religion in general and Christianity specifically is the gap between belief and practice. In a general sense, few actually imitate Jesus even though they go to church. One wonders if Jesus’s ecclesia in Matthew’s gospel was or really wasn’t “visible” institutionally but intended to be visible in the individual and collective.
Islam ‘ is tolerant with other religions’🫣🧐🤔
Dhimmitudes.
REALITY CHECK: Every claim in the big book o' bullshit has 3-4 counterclaims, so spare me your endless and pointless drama.
Low IQ bible scholars are legion. The big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained.
Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool.
Religion is a tool, used by those who rule, to pacify the fool.
My goodness, such anger! Be careful about that. It will not serve you well.
Hi Alex, I found this analysis of yours very illuminating and I was not aware of much of the information specific to Pakistan and India other than that infamous Nutsy Yahoo quote. However one thing in it confuses me. You wrote:
"On 22 April, a terrorist attack took place in Pahalagam, in India's territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The attack was attributed to Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and its military. It left 25 Indian tourists and one Nepali individual dead. The attack provoked outrage in India and vows of retribution, which finally happened during the night of 6 May as India launched an air attack against Pakistan."
However you did not comment on who attributed the attack to ISI. For me, I would assume the attack was planned and sponsored as a joint FF venture between Mossad and MI6. They had the motivation to start this war and it showed their psychopathic disregard for any semblance which is conventionally referred to as human decency. They both regard this attitude tactically as a laudable feature and not a bug.
As commonly occurs though, their overweening pride was oblivious to the amazing superiority of the Chinese fighter jets over the NATO jets, and particularly their air-to-air missiles, resulting in the aggression literally blowing up in their faces. It is unfortunate that Rutte and Macron were not piloting two of the destroyed Indian jets.
When the "12 day war" resumes in September, and if the Zionists repeat their tactic of using F-35s to launch cruise missiles from outside of Iranian air space, it would be a total hoot if the Iranians were prepared to send these Chinese fighters outside of their airspace also and shoot down the Zionist F-35's. If I could be sure of this occurring, I would bet the farm (for what it is worth) on shorting Lockheed-Martin stock.
I would welcome your return comment on this specific.
India has never provided any evidence that Pakistan was behind the attack. Your suspicions are accurate
Alex I am a fan of yours but I feel this analysis is completely wrong. Pakistan is a complete and total western puppet state. Since the 1970's the US has had good ties with the Pakistani junta and intelligence agency. So much so that the US deployed warships against India when Pakistan was badly losing the war in Bangladesh. When the Soviet's invaded Afghanistan the Pakistani government was a central linchpin in providing help to the terrorists and mujhadeen in Afghanistan. The military whom you quote as being opposed by Israel was being actively aided and funded by the CIA. This is a pretty mainstream opinion. However once he became a liability for them the CIA took him out. And installed a new military junta. Once the war was over the CIA kept it's contacts in the ISI and Pakistan continued to function as a US proxy to influence matters in Afghanistan. The nukes you talk about, their research was funded by Saudis. Who do you think the Saudis work for? The west. Just like Qatar the provide the money to terrorists and help the west keep their hands clean. Once the war on terror began in Afghanistan it was Pakistan which was the main logistical corridor for the Nato forces there. However because the Taliban was very weak and couldn't offer any real resistance to Nato the CIA decided to arm them with Pakistan's help. All the factories producing weapons and bombs for the Taliban were in Pakistan. This made Taliban more aggressive and consequently justified US occupation of the country. Last year when Raisi was the President of Iran Pakistan literally did missile strikes on Iran which the tried to play of as a mistake. But Iran clearly didn't consider it as such because the retaliated back with strikes of their own. It is a well known fact that the military junta runs Pakistan. This power was being challenged by Imran Khan who was trying to assert some independent power of his own as a PM. One of this was visiting russia on the day of the invasion in ukraine(SMO). However the US state department collaborated with the current Pakistani government to overthrow him for this crime. There was extensive research done on this by Dropsite news. The current Pakistani government was literally put in place by the US. Later Imran khan was persecuted and put in prison after a failed assassination attempt. Early last year Pakistan had elections which were clearly rigged by the military. Millions of Pakistanis came out on streets in protest against it. Pakistan's current financial condition is extremely brittle. They can't qualify for loans from even Saudi and China inspire of their interests in Pakistan. That's why the Pakistani government is surviving on loans from the IMF which approved them inspite of virtual certainty of never being repaid. Who controls the IMF? Again the west does. What do you think they demanded in return? While all this was happening Pakistan was facing massive terrorist attacks from the Pakistani Taliban and Balochi separatists. You say that India arms the Balochis however most weapons the balochis have turn out to be american leftovers from the afghan war. What is more plausible; that India smuggles weapons across one of the world's most militarised borders or that the weapons come from the wild west that is Afghanistan. And guess who gets to justify continued massive military spending when the country goes to shit? That's right the Pakistani junta who pocket most of that money and store it in their swiss accounts and french mansions. How many iranian government officials do you think have property in the west? Also lest we forget the US has multiple military bases in Pakistan. One would think that if the Pakistani government truly opposed the west they might give a thought to expelling western troops in their own country. Also any sane government would not risk war as its on the verge of bankruptcy unless ofcourse that in itself is a condition for being eligible for the next loan. If you remember last there was a regime change op in Bangladesh where a western friendly puppet regime was established. Simultaneously there was regime change in Pakistan. In this way the west can punish India for being in the BRICS by putting pressure on both flanks. How is this any different than color revolutions in Ukraine and Georgia. Coming back to more recent times The Pakistani government beat its chest about how they supported Iran and the very next day Donald Trump had a lunch with the Pakistani chief of staff. Do you think that a country which really threatened the US & Israel with nukes would get dinner invites to the white house? Pakistan's role is very obvious here it is to be the Trojan horse for Iran. If Iran trusts them and Turkey it is setting itself up for betrayal. The israeli media talking about attacking Pakistan is just a pure ploy give credibility to the Pakistani government's efforts to make friends with Iran. It os just as fake as their talk about going to war with Turkey. If they truly opposed either of these regimes which cooperate fully with the west they would attempt to regime change them like they are trying in iran. Instead they make dubious claims and talk about war. Both Turkey and Pakistan have american bases. Until they expel them there no reason even to begin trusting them. The economic and political situation in pakistan is quite bad so this short conflict could also help in bolstered public support for the junta. As for the Indian planes being shot down there is evidence for only two of them. Also the Indian planes were striking terrorist sites as a retaliation. This claim is not challenged by Pakistan as far as I know. So the Indians expected Pakistan to not object to this in order to prevent escalation. This process is not unprecedented as it had happened before in 2019. Both sides could have gotten out without losing face. However Pakistan chose to attack the planes whereas the Indian planes were not allowed to shoot back. If there was a war as Pakistan wanted which country do you think would last long? The normal one or the one on the verge of bankruptcy? The west is putting pressure on India just as they do with russia or china. They wouldn't bother to do so if they thought India wasn't serious about brics eg. Egypt. I am extremely disheartened when I say the Iranians associating with Turkey,Pakistan and Azerbaijan instead of russia or china or india. I feel like Pezeshkian truly is a fifth columnist traitor like pashinyan is in Armenia. I was very disappointed when iran agreed to a ceasefire with israel. What could iran get from that except betrayal. Anyways I hope you and the admiral do better research next time and don't just trust the media narrative while reaching a conclusion.
Andy, 100% correct on all points. Alex has commented on an area and a subject that he knows nothing about, as is clear from his evidence-free repetition of Pakistan's creative lies and total ignorance of Pakistan's role as major western (US) ally in the region.
"The West has become a totalitarian space – the space of a self-defensive hegemony defending itself against its own weakness." (Jean Baudrillard)
The system today survives only through the successful marketing of emergencies: pandemics, military conflicts, trade wars, and other disasters waiting in line. Chaos and destabilisation are deliberately weaponised in order to trigger a series of Pavlovian chain reactions whose actual 'raison d’être' is emphatically financial.
The most ludicrous part of the story is that the super-indebted and super-unproductive superpower now needs the aid of inflation to keep its dirty underbelly covered. However tedious the debt maths may seem to most of us, it alone confirms that today’s system is bankrupt – a predicament significantly exacerbated by the ubiquitous phenomenon of “collapse denialism”, which edges the system closer to the nuclear “solution”.
Your posts on the Ukraine / Russia conflict and the US fiscal situation are usually interesting, logical and backed up by evidence. However this post surprisingly fails on all counts. Let me go down the list of errors and lack of evidence I find through the post.
1. Domazet may be an authoritative source for Ukraine / Russia / Serbia / NATO matters but he is clearly out of his depth when commenting on India, Pakistan, China. India's deal for the Rafales includes technology transfer, including software, and eventual manufacture in India. Pakistan is getting the Chinese hardware and support almost free as quid pro quo for Pakistan supporting China in the BRI and other international matters.
2. India has its own satellites and its own GPS which is a match for the best in the world. Indian defence staff are well aware of China's operational support for Pakistan and it would be foolish to assume they did not plan for it.
3. All six Indian jets were shot down??? Evidence? none. Pakistan has not produced a single piece of evidence of downed jets on their side of the border. FYI, India is a boisterous open society where even a single bomb falling down anywhere would be on social media instantly. There is no way that 6 downed jets could be kept secret. Sorry Alex, you have swallowed Pak disinformation hook, line and sinker.
4. You 'forgot' to mention India's BrahMOS missile, based on Russian technology modified and manufactured in India. It is a hypersonic missile and hits by this missile disabled all of Pakistan's major airfields on the first day itself.
5. India's BrahMOS missiles also hit the Noor Khan airbase, known to be a storage site for Pak's nuclear bombs. The missile effectively collapsed part of the hill and blocked the entrance to the nuclear storage site. A US top secret plane carrying tech to counter radiation and nuclear fallout was urgently sent to Noor Khan airbase the next day. If India wanted, they could have continued the attack and destroyed Pak's ability to fight a war. It was Pakistan that urgently asked for a cease-fire, backed up by Trump. We don't know exactly why India ceased operations, but it is certainly not due to any loss of ability to continue. There is a lot of evidence of this from Indian sources which obviously you didn't look for.
6. Geo-strategic conclusions: You say the west is trying to contain Pakistan - utterly wrong. Pakistan is already in the western sphere, while at the same time walking a fine line with China. Pakistan is surviving hand-to-mouth solely on money from the US and the IMF. China is helping Pakistan in areas of interest to itself - BRI and to keep India busy on the western front. In fact, there is talk that the Pak nuclear capability is not home-grown but rather US nuclear bombs kept in Pakistan, potentially for use against China & India.
You conclude that the seat of power will eventually move from the West to the East but fail to notice that the East also includes India.
Thanks for the real news about the unrelenting will for death and chaos by the City of London to gain profit .
The Oreshink is one step ahead of the nuclear war so desired by this criminally minded oligarchy.
Good surprises await us in the silence never spoken .
We forget, or never know, what goes on beneath the surface. Thanks for that eye-opener!
I agree with most of this and your last point. They want to provoke a nuclear conflict because they know they will lose a conventional one.
This Croatian admiral has a gift for clarity. I read his article on the implications of hypersonic technology, but the great powers continue to play the same old game. They don't seem to understand, they don't seem to want to realize. I don't think they're stupid, and I have only two explanations: either they're truly desperate, or they're a demonic cult bent on destroying humanity.
Thanks Alex.
One point that needs to be continually pushed into mainstream awareness is the fact the West is clearly under the influence of the most extreme criminal element on the face of the Planet. The Banking connections to the Drug Cartels, the genocidal Zionist terror regime of Israel, the Pharmaceutical Industry both medical and agricultural, the Arms industry, and the UN, all go to demonstrate these creatures that are less than human and have no legitimate place in the governance of humanity.
Their names, their face, their residence's, their places of business, and their crimes, need to be constantly made public knowledge.
Who wins?
Military technology notwithstanding, I can't imagine how the West could win any confrontation with the East, considering the general state of mind of the occidental populations. Westerners live in an illusion of general superiority over the rest of the world, immersed in various inane or decadent activities, unable to fight their way out of a paper bag. The vast majority of people have zero motivation to go to war, despite the fearmongering about the Russian threat. The part of the population who might be responsive to the propaganda generally subscribe to the trans-blah-blah-blah ideology and are effeminate weaklings who wouldn't last a second on the battlefield, and those who don't, and stay in good shape, generally see through the bullshit and wouldn't be caught dead fighting for the globalist elites.
Does anybody remember the (44) day war in Nagorno-Karabakh, where Azerbaijan attacked Armenia's province? Well, sorry to burst your bubble, but Pakistan was on the same team as Israel, Turkey, and Azerbaijan, along with Ukraine to topple the 2nd Republic known as Artsakh.
If you think that the informed believe that Pakistan is on the side of Al-Qaeda, that is not entirely wrong, as the entire Collective West is on the side of Al-Qaeda, establishing a Sharia Law state and pressuring Syrian minorities to accept Islam, while US and EU NGO's offer new VISAs to expatriating Syrian Christians.
Showing Pakistan is rooting for Iran, like it showed in the (12) day battle with Israel, is like Turkey screaming about the rights of Palestinians, while it has a 40% export of Azerbaijani oil being delivered like clockwork to the ports of its "adversary."