161 Comments

one of the most hopeful essays I've read in a long, long time. very worth considering.

Expand full comment

Thank you Marie!

Expand full comment

To further explore the deep correlation between City of London and Wall St, the names of the leading families are helpful, who share the locations: Rothschild, Fink, Warburg, Schiff, ...but extend to Morgan etc and explore the history. I recommend:

Treason in America, Chatkin ( Larouch Organisation is very articulate on the topic)

The Empire of "The City": The Secret History of British Financial Power, Knuth

The secrets of the Federal Reserve, Millins

Russia/Orthodoxies long standing rivalry with "Khazars", these podcasts are enlightening.

https://parallelmike.com/ series: Saturn Bankers 1-4

Note: Nomads from central Asia, whether Turkic or Mongol, or even before like the people from todays Iran (Scythians, Allens etc) always mopped up peoples from conquered territories, and included them in their structures. Kharzas had many different ethnicities in their tribe.

Expand full comment

Putin, Trump, and Xi are up against the same City of London cabal.

Expand full comment

I wouldn't want to be the cabal right now. It's a bunch of in-bred degenerates against some of the most capable leaders in history with powerful economies, diplomatic corps, intel agencies and militaries. And they're not confused about who the enemy is.

Expand full comment

Not sure how Trump will work against the same Zionists, who are paying for him, in his cabinet and control both the Fed and the Senate/Congress

or if he really wants to

Estimate: he is moving forward with Gold revaluation out of desperation, Wall St/City understand they need to do this step or the BRICS will completely outpace them with their Gold acquisition and revaluation. Trump to revalue at paltry sum, to take the initiative from the BRICS.

Do not think that will work, anything below 14000 does not move the needle, and only 25000 and above give 20% for the Dollar

Expand full comment

Your book was banned in 2017? I had no idea that the USA banned books! Or anywhere in the West banned books! Not back in the more innocent seeming days before the Pandemic of Hysteria.

I have great faith in Vladimir Putin and have had since he first took charge. I hate all the anti-Russian propaganda. Centuries of it - hysterical women in crinolines bewailing the dastardly Russians in the Crimea! And yet Russian literature shows us that they are a deep and thoughtful people capable of great love and great sacrifice.

Expand full comment

I would not be surprised to learn that more Russians have died in battle than all other nations put together. It's certainly true as far back into history as my understanding goes.

Expand full comment

Great observation. At the start of WWII, both Countries populations were roughly equal.

Two things radically changed that.

1- Russian lost lives (some say over 25mm) which also devastated their economy.

2- USA's ability to selectively join the war well after everyone else, and the USA was never invaded (unlike Russia).

Today, Russia's population (at roughly 125mm) is basically at the same place pre-WWII. We in turn are almost 3x the size the USA was in 1939.

From AI: The 1940 United States census, conducted after the start of World War II but before the U.S. entry into the war, recorded the U.S. population as 132,164,569, an increase of 7.6 percent from the 1930 population of 122,775,046 people.

Expand full comment

I would also add that communism under the Soviets did not encourage post-war growth and optimism to the extent that capitalism in the USA did in that period. Today though, Russia seems to be more optimistic in many ways than the USA, at least up until 3 weeks ago.

Expand full comment

Beautifully said, thank you!

Expand full comment

Hope. Few expected so much hope in the first THREE WEEKS of Trump's Second Presidency.

In a way, the DNC stealing of the 2020 US election may seem a blessing in hindsight.

Expand full comment

It ('the steal') was all part of the Plan. Trump often said 'the people needed to see how bad it could get,' which is of course true; but the real reason is much larger than that. Many things needed to be done in the 2020-24 timeframe, and Trump could not be in office while these things were happening.

Everything you see going on in the last three weeks has been planned and gamed out. Trump (and team) is waiting for the right moment to defang the court system, which has been standing in the way of progress ever since the 1803 Marbury v Madison decision. The courts will be told in no uncertain terms that they may no longer interfere with the operation of the Executive Branch. They have no real power -- President Andrew Jackson is often quoted as saying "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it." (That, by the way, is the same Chief Justice John Marshall responsible for Marbury v Madison, to which then President Thomas Jefferson greatly objected in a letter to Marshall. Alas, that is a story for another day...)

The real power in the US Federal Government lies in the Executive Branch. Donald Trump is about to show them.

Expand full comment

It's an interesting idea, but I can't take realistically the notion that Trump "planned" the entire shitfuckery of the past 4 years. He was genuinely angry the result was rigged against him, he did not expect the ENORMOUS range of measures used to try to prevent him running again and the destruction of his business, family, and supporters, and he certainly did not expect to still be alive only because a DNC assassin missed his head by millimetres due to strong winds.

I think it's much more likely to say that... "Shit happens", rather than some mastermind pulling all the strings.

I could be wrong, of course.

As for the "Imperial Presidency", the truth is that the POTUS has become CONSIDERABLY more powerful already than the original FF had intended, and with considerably less oversight. The judiciary are there precisely to prevent Congress and the President from overstepping their Constitutional limits.

Yes, I entirely agree that they have become too politicised, not with any "Woke" nonsense, but the DNC and neocon (But I repeat myself) cabal to prevent any opposition to their planned Imperial and technological dictatorship.

The "Real Power" should NOT reside in the Presidency, but in the People, as in "We, the People", and the Presidency should be as rigorously circumscribed and limited as the rest of the US regime.

After all, you never know who next President will be.

Just imagine, that by skulduggery or an evil miracle, if it is Killary in the Oval.

Surely you can see from this hideous potential why it is important for the 3 branches to balance each other, and why all 3 branches MUST become more cognisant of what The People actually want?

I understand that some centralisation is in order, and even essential for a while, to help cleanse out the corrupted officials and branches of Govt, but this centralisation should only be applauded if it is for a strictly limited time. ANY dictatorship is bad news, for any length of time. Even if it one you like. For sure as eggs is eggs, at some point that unaccountable power will start doing things you DON'T like.

Expand full comment

I didn't mean to imply that Trump planned this all himself. He's part of a much larger organization, of which he is the nominal figurehead (and likely, a major contributor).

And no I do not want any government to have infinite power. The problem is that the branch of government claiming final authority (since 1803) is the Supreme Court. In Marbury v Madison, the court arrogated that power (judicial review) unto themselves. This was after the question of judicial review was discussed and tabled at the Constitutional Convention since it was clear no solution being discussed would receive the support of 3/4 of the States. The matter was left to future Conventions (which have not happened). Then Chief Justice Marshall stepped in.

What Trump needs to do is to re-balance things and return the Executive to its position as the pre-eminent branch of government. Trump knows there are things he can't do, for instance, without the assent of Congress. He knows he's required to enforce laws (passed by Congress) even if he disagrees with them. But so far as operation of the executive branch, i.e. the people that work for him, neither Congress nor the courts should have authority. Congress can create, and apportion money for, the Department of Education; but the President and his delegated officers must have full discretion regarding how to run the DoE. That's all I'm saying, but as you can see with all these lawsuits and temporary restraining orders, the courts clearly think they have power that they should not. Trump needs to claim that power back... as it was before Marbury.

Expand full comment

May I suggest that this "much larger organization" that stands behind Trump consists of America patriots who are more than fed up with the parasitic supranational entities devouring the US?

Expand full comment
4dEdited

Madison and his cohort envisioned a government of balances, since they were all too aware of what can happen otherwise. But, to have "balance" sometimes when one part of the whole gets too powerful, or too evil, another part of the system must temporarily become stronger, until the balance is once again achieved. I'm not worried (yet) about the Trump presidency.

Expand full comment

I did not know that Hegel said that but I think it is true. Thanks for links to your book, listening now. Let us hope that the rise of censorship during the Biden administration might now abate a bit. I think you are quite right that the main problem is the bankers, but another thing that worries me is A.I. If these two team up things could be very bad. I would like some sort of money that no bank could control. For me - I suppose to some extent following Marx - money is an expression of human inequality and power striving. Humans want to enslave other humans and profit by their enslavement. That force drives history. Money is an abstract representation of that natural urge. If we could get a money system that was inflation proof and uncontrolled by any bank that would

, I think, be a step in a good direction. Is Utopia possible? I think so, yes. Is it probable? not so sure about that one.

Expand full comment

Utopia, depending on how we define it, is possible. One foot in front of the other... a voyage of a 1000 miles starts with the first step, doesn't it?

Expand full comment

It does. We agree

Expand full comment

One of the reasons why the Cabal is on the run is that the White Hats have outplayed them, in no small part because they have been using advanced AI the Cabal could not match. The players are like a couple chess masters, looking at the board. They both know who will win the game; all that is left is to play out the remaining moves -- or for the loser to concede.

In a chess match, it's considered the honorable thing to concede, and live to play another day. For the Cabal, there will be no concession because this is a game to the death. [They] have no motivation to concede, no upside. Play on, and the White Hats might make a mistake. Highly unlikely of course, but you can see why the game goes on.

Expand full comment

Yes Bill, for the Cabal this is existential, just as it was for our Republic. We "stand on the edge of a knife, stray but a little and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while all the Company is true.” - Galadriel

Expand full comment

Interesting we often seem to refer back to the work of Tolkien, CS Lewis et al 🍿

Expand full comment

"That each man shall live for his fellow man" is wrong, wrong, wrong.

It's down to the argument between the principles, "shall we have total dependence?" or "shall we have total independence?".

The first was the basic of the Communism which failed in both Russia and China. People are too different to live this way, their talents, wants, aims, insights, are too different. T

he second is what America has become with it's Randian "each man for himself" approach.

There is a third way, which is inter-dependence.

Each person takes responsibility for their own actions, choices, but also for how they grow as a human being, what their values are to be, how they employ their talents and natural abilities, but at the same time aware that we all live together, and that we share common needs, wants and aims. that within society, as individuals, we recognise other individuals, and all live to give reverence to that highest values, the sancity of life.

All that works to improve life to it's optimum possible, is good, and we need to share certain actions and choices. All that works to deprive anyone of their chance to attain the optimum good for their life that they can is bad.

Anything that deprives others of their optimum life is evil. it's really that simple.

We are only totally dependent as infants and small children. As we grow, we first fight for our independence as we must learn self identity and where we belong in the world.

And at maturity we attain the final - inter-dependence, a world of independent people who take personal responsibility for themselves and acceptance of deserved rewards, living in co-operative harmony with everyone else, assisting where needed, supporting where deserved and always refraining from any action which is not conducive to the good, both of ourselves and others but also of all of humanity.

Expand full comment

Second Anarchist I've met on substack today. <3

May it be so. xx

Expand full comment
3dEdited

"The first was the basic of the Communism which failed in both Russia and China." --

Except that it was not a communism, and whatever it was, its current mutated from is rather conducive to the best in humanity: meritocracy, good education for children, emphasis on cooperation, respect to traditions.

It is fine and dandy to talk about Randian independence, but Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum was keen to get her social security and thus use the welfare state when she needed it. Inter-dependence relies on financing, planning, and infrastructure. Welcome to the real world.

Expand full comment

In the coders world the iteration of your comment is called a loop. In the real world, your vision butts up to the processor and live memory capacity of almost all human individuals. In crowd psychology and Freudian analysis, this word-prank cry's out looser on the horizon, take advantage!

I would class this comment in the category of seven people giving advice to the last 5 in the dozen, and ending up in the seven advisers echo-chamber.

Expand full comment

I managed to get a copy before it was banned at Amazon. I refer to it often

Expand full comment

May I remind my fellow Catholics here (and of course all the heathens reading this too😉) that Our Lady of Fatima promised that peace and a return to Christianity will come from Russia.... (if Russia was consecrated to Her...) https://grasisgroen15.substack.com/p/europe-at-the-crossroads

Expand full comment

I was thinking this recently reading a latest Simplicus post about all the shenanigans going on in the Baltic, the constant ratcheting up by Nato, the EU and bitter Baltic states, how it's all so bloody tiring and wouldn't it be better if we redirected this energy to something way more productive, to work together, rather than constant pissing around sowing division.

Expand full comment

Fair enough, but you're not going to work with the City of London, Wall Street and their agents which are many and everywhere, are you? Maybe if you want to defeat their agenda to enslave you, you might consider a division between them and the rest of humanity? Working with them would be like forging chains with which they'll enslave your children.

Expand full comment

Work together locally. Grow food not lawns. Adopt permaculture practices. Get close to your community. Pull your power back. Don't toss it away to disinterested politicians.

Expand full comment

This decent way of living is anathema for money changers. They hate independent people.

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing this beautiful substack. It certainly inspires hope!

If Trump was truly a man of the people, he would see that we are all One, and bend a knee to Putin. This would by far be his greatest accomplishment.

Expand full comment

Thank you Hillary! I think it is not necessary for Trump to bend a knee to Putin and I believe that Putin, as a man of the people would not ask this of him. Instead his extended hand of friendship is there to meet Trump's. It truly is a very hopeful moment for humanity.

Expand full comment

You are right. That phrase was probably too strong. Friendship works better. But is it strong enough. Am I wrong to think that Trump is breaking apart the Cold War propaganda stuck within the World's psyche, starting with America?

This is indeed very exciting to watch! An even harder task, will be for Trump to work with China.

Thank you, Alex, for allowing me to comment.

Expand full comment

Trump and Putin already greatly respect and even like one another. There is no need for either to bend a knee. They are working together -- leaders of the Sovereign Alliance -- to take down the Cabal. And they have been working together since long before that escalator ride.

edit: A couple links you might find interesting --

https://burningbright.substack.com/p/righteous-russia-part-0-enemy-of

https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/why-the-globalists-are-terrified

https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/why-russia-saved-the-united-states

Expand full comment

Thank you for the links--they are just what I need!

Expand full comment

You are welcome. I'm glad you found them interesting!

Expand full comment

Was delighted to see Trump man-up and reach out to Putin, and start an adult, presidential dialogue in spirit and tenor. It is too everyone's benefit worldwide that these leaders have meaningful dialogue to understand each other's positions and try to find areas where there is mutual benefit and reduce tension. Good to see Trump's imperialist theatre clown show has been retired for now. Seems as though someone on his team had a talk with Trump. Trump Jr?

Expand full comment

Certainly was not his son-in-law, who seems to animated by a different spirit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHv4Z5kwYkw

Expand full comment

Mr AK!!!! You are indeed a sole advocate of sound insight like this on Christian principles of truth and wisdom, thank you. Did you see T comments yest that echo one of your points, that if the US Russia and China agreed to an embargo on MIC spending and instead used those trillions of USD for productive use....well, we can only imagine the prosperity.

Expand full comment

Thank you! I did not see Trump's comments but not surprised. This is the direction we MUST take and Trump has credible, commitment-capable partners in the world now.

Expand full comment

The collective west' owners cannot be trusted. Neither Russia not China should lower their guard until the banking cartel is subdued. The mega-Looters can't help themselves but keep their prosperity by creating the rivers of human blood and mounds of human flesh. The owners are thoroughly degenerate and devoid of a shred of decency.

Expand full comment

There is another, less rose-glasses interpretation of the current rapprochement with Russia. It is a return to Kissinger's policy of driving Russia and China against each other, classic divide et impera. One of the last public statements by the old viper before he went to hell was about how deeply the neocons blundered by driving Russia and China together. Well, I guess the Cabal is now correcting that mistake, starting by dumping the neocon rabid dogs, and making ostensibly friendly overtures towards Russia.

These rapprochement smiles are not honest, they still want to destroy Russia, but have come to realize that they do not have the strength at this moment. And Trump is not a free agent; his victory was allowed, a part of carrying out the new plan B policy.

Expand full comment

Yes. Trump is now hinting at what is to come.

He's said 'we're gonna win so much you'll get tired of winning.' Now the curtains are being drawn back on just what that means.

Expand full comment

sure you've seen the speech by our VP Vance to the EU -- courage across the board; but at times I'm flummoxed by some in the resistance movement to chide/critique the efforts by T as illegal/improper/weaponization, etc; have tried to remain objective on his efforts, not to be too hopeful/optimistic and at same time to be energized by his absolute, concrete steps that have had real effect (such as today removing funding from schools still w a cv V mandate) -- he is actually undoing real harms from the past XX years. Plus, the courts who have ruled to date are likely all function of forum shopping plaintiffs, so time will tell on whether he's legal or not -- but why not give him the benefit of the doubt for now? Where do you go for news 'down the middle' without much bias?

Expand full comment

I believe SCOTUS is likely to rule that the courts may only interfere with executive actions in certain very limited circumstances, which (being SCOTUS) they will not define other than to say that what is at issue in these cases does not meet that criterion.

As for news down the middle, most outlets have some degree of bias. Pick one (or a few) that seem to be most trustworthy to you. Substack has a number of good authors, Alex is one of them.

Expand full comment

Mr. Krainer.....I am glad to read this post from you. Initially, I doubted whether you had anything useful to say. Now I realize I was very wrong. You hit the mark in identifying the source of humanity's worse enemy. The City of London banking cartel in league with their cohorts that run the Federal Reserve and the most powerful banks in America. They've been at it a long time and have corrupted America's institutions almost beyond repair. This of course includes the Rockefeller clan and the many entities they created to destroy our culture and society. To top it off you add what is the key to begin to reconcile humanity to a better fate. A partnership with the Russian people that has the potential to give hope that wars can end and peace will rule. Bravo and thank you. Keep up the good work. Wil Rodx

Expand full comment

Well thank you. I think?

Expand full comment

"When Goods Don't Cross Borders, Armies Will." Bastiat

Along with "All wars are bankers wars."

Alex is hitting the MARK with this one.

Thank you Alex

Expand full comment

Thank you!

Expand full comment

Thank you for your perspective - you give me hope that my grandchildren may live in peace- your in depth knowledge of history and its interpretation in relation to the world of today is greatly appreciated.

. Rare reflections - your Theranos articles - helped me see the deep state unmasked - the old guard letting down their defenses revealing themselves in league with a young woman who was their hope for further control of the masses - I knew their was something fishy in their involvement but you truly clarified it - slimy old men engaged in one last caper lured by the siren- thanks, so glad I found your writings.

Expand full comment

Thank you Karla, much appreciated!

Expand full comment

I remain of the persuasion that Russia should tread very warily around a hegemon which will not go quietly into the night. VVP has stated many times, rightly IMO, that the US is agreement incapable. And if we judge by actions rather than words then he's dead right.

I hope that DJT and VVP can find some common ground that would be beneficial for all humanity, but the US political system is corrupt beyond redemption, and since Presidents come and go there is ample opportunity for the banksters to bribe whomever they need or subvert the political process to get 'their man' into power.

Personally I go by the Biblical teaching. Ephesians 6:12 comes to mind with regard to who's running the planet. We also know that the Son of Perdition is coming, but the real question should be 'by what means does he enter the stage?' I think that will be post-war, likely global war, when humanity is on the ropes and desperate enough to accept someone of persuasion and charisma to pull the world back on its feet.

But here's hoping. Nineveh was given a second chance, and maybe we will too.

Expand full comment

What if the "anti-christ" brings peace, and the promethean fire of wisdom; and the "christ" brings the fire that 'cleanses the Earth'?

Where will Christianity and Christians sit on that one then?

Expand full comment

"the US political system is corrupt beyond redemption"

Agree. Cruelty and indecency are the banking cabal's birthmarks. Until the City of London/FedReserve are contained and disempowered, people of Russia will be under a mortal danger. The banking cabal lives by the supremacist rule of Kol Noidre. And supremacism always leads to genocide.

Expand full comment